Skip to content

JFK: New World Order Speech [1962.07.04]

2011.12.02

U.S. Puppet President John F. Kennedy: New World Order Speech

Independence Square, Philadelphia, 1962.07.04, 11:40 a.m.

Governor Powell [Governor Wesley Powell of New Hampshire, chairman of the Governors’ Conference], Your Excellency the Archbishop [The Most Reverend John Krol, Archbishop of Philadelphia], Governor Lawrence [Governor David L. Lawrence of Pennsylvania], Mayor Tate [Mayor James H. J. Tate of Philadelphia], Senator Clark [U.S. Senator Joseph S. Clark], Congressman Green [U.S. Representative William J. Green, Jr., of Pennsylvania], distinguished Governors, ladies and gentlemen, citizens of Philadelphia:

It is a high honor for any citizen of our great Republic to speak at this Hall of Independence on this day of Independence. To speak as President of the United States to the Chief Executives of our 50 States is both an opportunity and an obligation. The necessity for comity between the National Government and the several States is an indelible lesson of our long history.

Because our system is designed to encourage both differences and dissent, because its checks and balances are designed to preserve the rights of the individual and the locality against preeminent central authority, you and I, Governors, recognize how dependent we both are, one upon the other, for the successful operation of our unique and happy form of government. Our system and our freedom permit the legislative to be pitted against the executive, the State against the Federal Government, the city against the countryside, party against party, interest against interest, all in competition or in contention one with another. Our task — your task in the State House and my task in the White House — is to weave from all these tangled threads a fabric of law and progress. We are not permitted the luxury of irresolution. Others may confine themselves to debate, discussion, and that ultimate luxury — free advice. Our responsibility is one of decision — for to govern is to choose.

Thus, in a very real sense, you and I are the executors of the testament handed down by those who gathered in this historic hall 186 years ago today. For they gathered to affix their names to a document which was, above all else, a document not of rhetoric but of bold decision. It was, it is true, a document of protest — but protests had been made before. It set forth their grievances with eloquence — but such eloquence had been heard before. But what distinguished this paper from all the others was the final irrevocable decision that it took — to assert the independence of free States in place of colonies, and to commit to that goal their lives, their fortunes, and their sacred honor.

Today, 186 years later, that Declaration whose yellowing parchment and fading, almost illegible lines I saw in the past week in the National Archives in Washington is still a revolutionary document. To read it today is to hear a trumpet call. For that Declaration unleashed not merely a revolution against the British, but a revolution in human affairs. Its authors were highly conscious of its worldwide implications. And George Washington declared that liberty and self-government everywhere were, in his words, “finally staked on the experiment entrusted to the hands of the American people.”

This prophecy has been borne out. For 186 years this doctrine of national independence has shaken the globe — and it remains the most powerful force anywhere in the world today. There are those struggling to eke out a bare existence in a barren land who have never heard of free enterprise, but who cherish the idea of independence. There are those who are grappling with overpowering problems of illiteracy and ill-health and who are ill-equipped to hold free elections. But they are determined to hold fast to their national independence. Even those unwilling or unable to take part in any struggle between East and West are strongly on the side of their own national independence.

If there is a single issue that divides the world today, it is independence — the independence of Berlin or Laos or Viet-Nam; the longing for independence behind the Iron Curtain; the peaceful transition to independence in those newly emerging areas whose troubles some hope to exploit.

The theory of independence is as old as man himself, and it was not invented in this hall. But it was in this hall that the theory became a practice; that the word went out to all, in Thomas Jefferson’s phrase, that “the God who gave us life, gave us liberty at the same time.” And today this Nation — conceived in revolution, nurtured in liberty, maturing in independence — has no intention of abdicating its leadership in that worldwide movement for independence to any nation or society committed to systematic human oppression.

As apt and applicable as the Declaration of Independence is today, we would do well to honor that other historic document drafted in this hall — the Constitution of the United States. For it stressed not independence but interdependence — not the individual liberty of one but the indivisible liberty of all.

In most of the old colonial world, the struggle for independence is coming to an end. Even in areas behind the Curtain, that which Jefferson called “the disease of liberty” still appears to be infectious. With the passing of ancient empires, today less than 2 percent of the world’s population lives in territories officially termed “dependent.” As this effort for independence, inspired by the American Declaration of Independence, now approaches a successful close, a great new effort — for interdependence — is transforming the world about us. And the spirit of that new effort is the same spirit which gave birth to the American Constitution.

That spirit is today most clearly seen across the Atlantic Ocean. The nations of Western Europe, long divided by feuds far more bitter than any which existed among the 13 colonies, are today joining together, seeking, as our forefathers sought, to find freedom in diversity and in unity, strength.

The United States looks on this vast new enterprise with hope and admiration. We do not regard a strong and united Europe as a rival but as a partner. To aid its progress has been the basic object of our foreign policy for 17 years. We believe that a united Europe will be capable of playing a greater role in the common defense, of responding more generously to the needs of poorer nations, of joining with the United States and others in lowering trade barriers, resolving problems of commerce, commodities, and currency, and developing coordinated policies in all economic, political, and diplomatic areas. We see in such a Europe a partner with whom we can deal on a basis of full equality in all the great and burdensome tasks of building and defending a community of free nations.

It would be premature at this time to do more than indicate the high regard with which we view the formation of this partnership. The first order of business is for our European friends to go forward in forming the more perfect union which will someday make this partnership possible.

A great new edifice is not built overnight. It was 11 years from the Declaration of Independence to the writing of the Constitution. The construction of workable federal institutions required still another generation. The greatest works of our Nation’s founders lay not in documents and in declarations, but in creative, determined action. The building of the new house of Europe has followed the same practical, purposeful course. Building the Atlantic partnership now will not be easily or cheaply finished.

But I will say here and now, on this Day of Independence, that the United States will be ready for a Declaration of Interdependence, that we will be prepared to discuss with a united Europe the ways and means of forming a concrete Atlantic partnership, a mutually beneficial partnership between the new union now emerging in Europe and the old American Union founded here 175 years ago.

All this will not be completed in a year, but let the world know it is our goal.

In urging the adoption of the United States Constitution, [Talmudically-educated] Alexander Hamilton told his fellow New Yorkers “to think continentally.” Today Americans must learn to think intercontinentally.

Acting on our own, by ourselves, we cannot establish justice throughout the world; we cannot insure its domestic tranquility, or provide for its common defense, or promote its general welfare, or secure the blessings of liberty to ourselves and our posterity. But joined with other free nations, we can do all this and more. We can assist the developing nations to throw off the yoke of poverty. We can balance our worldwide trade and payments at the highest possible level of growth. We can mount a deterrent powerful enough to deter any aggression. And ultimately we can help to achieve a world of law and free choice, banishing the world of war and coercion.

For the Atlantic partnership of which I speak would not look inward only, preoccupied with its own welfare and advancement. It must look outward to cooperate with all nations in meeting their common concern. It would serve as a nucleus for the eventual union of all free men — those who are now free and those who are vowing that some day they will be free.

On Washington’s birthday in 1861, standing right there, President-elect Abraham Lincoln spoke in this hall on his way to the Nation’s Capital. And he paid a brief but eloquent tribute to the men who wrote, who fought for, and who died for the Declaration of Independence. Its essence, he said, was its promise not only of liberty “to the people of this country, but hope to the world . . . [hope] that in due time the weights should be lifted from the shoulders of all men, and that all should have an equal chance.”

On this fourth day of July, 1962, we who are gathered at this same hall, entrusted with the fate and future of our States and Nation, declare now our vow to do our part to lift the weights from the shoulders of all, to join other men and nations in preserving both peace and freedom, and to regard any threat to the peace or freedom of one as a threat to the peace and freedom of all. “And for the support of this Declaration, with a firm reliance on the protection of Divine Providence, we mutually pledge to each other our Lives, our Fortunes and our sacred Honor.”

Kike’s Whore JFK on Palestine & Zionism

2011.12.02

Kike’s Whore JFK on Palestine & Zionism

John F. Kennedy, Speech to the Golden Jubilee Banquet of B’nai Zion, New York City, 1959.02.09

“Our own history as a nation and Israel’s have many parallels — in the diversity of their origins, in their capacity to reach the unattainable, in the receptivity to new ideas and social experimentation…

“History records several… breakthroughs – great efforts to which spiritual conviction and human endurance have combined to make realities out of prophecies. The Puritans in Massachusetts, the Mormons in Salt Lake City, the Scotch-Irish in the Western territories were all imbued with the truth of the old Jewish thought that a people can have only as much sky over its head as it has land under its feet…

“I would like to…dispel a prevalent myth … the assertion that it is Zionism which has been the unsettling and fevered infection in the Middle East, the belief that without Israel there would somehow be a natural harmony throughout the Middle East and Arab world. Quite apart from the values and hopes which the State of Israel enshrines… it twists reality to suggest that it is the democratic tendency of Israel which has injected discord and dissension into the Near East. Even by the coldest calculations, the removal of Israel would not alter the basic crisis in the area… The basic rivalries within the Arab world, the quarrels over boundaries, the tensions involved in lifting their economies from stagnation, the cross pressures of nationalism — all of these factors would still be there, even if there were no Israel…

Israel, on the other hand, embodying all the characteristics of a Western democracy and having long passed the threshold of economic development, shares with the West a tradition of civil liberties, of cultural freedom, of parliamentary democracy, of social mobility…

“The choice today is not between either the Arab states or Israel. Ways must be found of supporting the legitimate aspirations of each. The United States, whose President was first to recognize the new State of Israel, need have no apologies – indeed should pride itself – for the action it took…

“The Jewish state found its fulfilment during a time when it bore witness, to use the words of Markham, to humanity betrayed, “plundered, profaned, and disinherited.” But it is yet possible that history will record this event as only the prelude to the betterment and therapy, not merely of a strip of land, but of a broad expanse of almost continental dimensions… [A]s we observe the inspiring experience of Israel, we know that we must make the effort…”

JFK: “America Salutes Israel”, Yankee Stadium, 1956.04.29

We are gathered here this afternoon to commemorate a notable anniversary in man’s eternal quest for freedom. For nearly 8 years ago today a state was born — and a people, rising from the ashes of history’s most ruthless persecution, entered upon a new birth of freedom. The state was the State of Israel — and the people were the children of Israel. Today, as the anniversary of that monumental event recurs for the eighth time – Israel, we salute you.

Much is different between the United States and Israel. Our Nation stretches in a great land mass between two wide oceans — the Israelis occupy a beachhead on the eastern Mediterranean. Americans number 165 million — the Israelis less than 2 million. We are the oldest Republic on earth and the youngest people — the Israelis have the youngest republic and the oldest people.

Yes, much is different — but much is the same. For both Israel and the United States won their freedom in a bitter war for independence. Both Israel and the United States acknowledge the supremacy of the moral law – both believe in personal as well as national liberty — and, perhaps most important, both will fight to the end to maintain that liberty.

I join in this salute today because of my own deep admiration for Israel and her people — an admiration based not on hearsay, not on assumption, but on my own personal experience. For I went to Palestine in 1939; and I saw there an unhappy land, ruled under a League of Nations mandate by a Britain which divided and ruled in accordance to ancient policy. And while there I was shocked by a British Foreign Office white paper just issued sharply cutting back Jewish immigration. Yes, as in the days of old, “the glory had departed from Israel.” For century after century, Romans, Turks, Christians, Moslems, Pagans, British — all had conquered the Holy Land — but none could make it prosper. In the words of Israel Zangwill: “The land without a people waited for the people without a land.” The realm where once milk and honey flowed, and civilization flourished, was in 1939 a barren realm — barren of hope and cheer and progress as well as crops and industries — a gloomy picture for a young man paying his first visit from the United States.

But 12 years later, in 1951, I traveled again to the land by the River Jordan — this time as a Member of the Congress of the United States — and this time to see first-hand the new State of Israel. The transformation which had taken place could not have been more complete. For between the time of my visit in 1939 and my visit in 1951, a nation had been reborn – a desert had been reclaimed — and a national integrity had been redeemed, after 2,000 years of seemingly endless waiting. Zion had at least been restored — and she had promptly opened her arms to the homeless and the weary and the persecuted. It was the “Ingathering of the Exiles” — they had heard the call of their homeland; and they had come — “brands plucked from the burning” — they had come from concentration camps and ghettoes, from distant exile and dangerous sanctuary, from broken homes in Poland and lonely huts in Yemen, like the ancient strangers in a strange land they had come. And Israel received them all, fed them, housed them, cared for them, bound up their wounds, and enlisted them in the struggle to build a new nation.

But perhaps the greatest change of all I found lay in the hearts and minds of the people. For, unlike the discouraged settlers of 1939, they looked to the future with hope. From Haifa to the Gulf of Akaba, from Gaza to the Dead Sea, I found a revival of an ancient spirit. I found it in Israel’s gift to world statesmanship, David Ben-Gurion. I saw it in the determined step of soldiers and workers; I heard it in the glad voices of women in the fields; I saw it in the hopeful eyes of refugees waiting patiently in their misery. The barren land I had seen in 1939 had become the vital nation of 1951.

Yes; Israel, we salute you. We honor your progress and your determination and your spirit. But in the midst of our rejoicing we do not forget your peril. We know that no other nation in this world lives out its days in an atmosphere of such constant tension and fear. We know that no other nation in this world is surrounded on every side by such violent hate and prejudice.

Will Israel fall? Will this noblest of all the 20th century’s experiments in democracy sink beneath the surface, not to rise again for still another 2,000 years? Part of the answer rests with the United States, the leader of the free world, and the godfather of the infant nation Israel. I shall not now attempt to chart our course in detail. But I shall say, and say again, that this is no time for equivocation or hesitation.

TIME FOR ACTION IS NOW

It is long past time for this Nation and others to make it absolutely clear that any aggression or threat of aggression in the Middle East will not be tolerated by the United Nations or the parties to the 1950 Tripartite Agreement. It is time that we made this so clear, in the U.N. and elsewhere, that no nation would dare to launch an attack. For it is the responsibility of our Government to make certain that neither Israel nor any small nation of the world is left defenseless without arms while neighboring states dedicated to their destruction receive unlimited quantities of Communist arms. It is time that all the nations of the world, in the Middle East and elsewhere, realized that Israel is here to stay. She will not surrender — she will not retreat — and we will not let her fall.

Today we celebrate her 8th birthday — but I say without hesitation that she will live to see an 80th birthday – and an eight hundredth. For peace is all Israel asks, no more — a peace that will “beat swords into plowshares and spears into pruning-hooks”; a peace that will enable the desert to “rejoice and blossom as the rose,” “when the wicked cease from troubling and the weary be at rest.” Then, and only then, will the world have witnessed the complete fulfillment of Isaiah’s prophecy “Tzee-Yon B’Meeshpat Teepadeh” – “Zion shall be redeemed through justice.” [n.b. See “ZION vs KIKES”, below. — Akira] And all of us here, and there, and everywhere will then be able to say to each other with faith and with confidence, in our coming and in our going: “Shalom” – peace! Peace be with you, now and forever.

John F. Kennedy, from “The Strategy of Peace”, 1960

“In 1939 I first saw Palestine, then an unhappy land under alien rule, and to a large extent then a barren land. […] In 1951, I travelled again to the land by the River Jordan, to see firsthand the new State of Israel. The transformation that had taken place was hard to believe. For in those twelve years, a nation had been born, a desert had been reclaimed, and the most tragic victims of World War II…had found a home.”

JFK, Annual Banquet of Histadrut Zionist Organization, Baltimore, Maryland, 1956.11.27

It is a genuine pleasure to be here tonight to join with you in tribute to my distinguished friend and your State Senator, Philip Goodman [KIKE, from Poland; Maryland State Senator, 1955-1960; Mayor of Baltimore, 1962-1963]. I first met Phil Goodman at the Democratic National Convention in Chicago last summer. But in that short period of time, and particularly on that occasion, I have come to know the warm loyalty of his friendship and his able determination as a political leader. His support of me at Chicago, which I did not solicit and for which he did not bargain, was one of the most gratifying surprises I received during those exciting days. And I am grateful to him for his efforts even though he did not succeed in obtaining for me the votes of the Maryland delegation — in fact, I am more grateful than ever, for if he had succeeded, I might have been made the Vice-Presidential nominee! In any event, my friendship with Phil Goodman is one of the lasting benefits for me to come out of that Convention; and I am delighted that so many of you have gathered tonight to pay him a yell-deserved tribute. Equally fitting is the dedication in his name of a hospital wing of the Medical Center in Jaffa. For his career has been one of service — service to his city, state and nation — service to the Jewish people and homeland — and service to his party and the principles for which he has fought all his life.

Politicians are always being asked to address testimonial dinners, for this individual or that, for this cause or that, to join in a lengthy procession of eulogies that are embarrassing to the subject and boring to the audience. But this is one case where I believe the cause and the individual to be worthy of every tribute we can pay — and I was delighted to come for that purpose.

I want to also take this opportunity to greet my good friend Congressman San Friedel [KIKE; U.S. Congressman, 1953-1971], in whose district this dinner is being held. His years of service to you on your City Council, in your State Legislature and as a particularly hard working Congressman have, I know, merited from you the same respect and affection he now enjoys from all of his colleagues in Washington. I amlooking forward to many more years of working in the Congress with Sam Friedel. I know that you will do your bit to make this possible, and I am hopeful the voters of Massachusetts will do their part also.

Tonight’s dinner, I understand, is the annual highlight of your Histadrut campaign here in Baltimore, which is emphasizing this year the construction of the Medical Center in Jaffa named for your great and good Dr. Herman Seidel and its new wing named for Senator Goodman. I have no doubt that the tensions and crises that now swirl about Israel and the whole Middle Eastern area have introduced a new factor into your campaign. And yet I am equally certain that those of you who are gathered here tonight will no more permit that present turmoil to lessen your concern for the people of Israel than that brave democracy has permitted its problems abroad to interfere with its humanitarian progress at home.

Whatever may be the background, the difficulties, the merits or the eventual outcome of those conflicts, we know that the State of Israel will remain — and we know that assistance from her friends in this country will still be desperately needed. The nation will continue to grow; and the exiles from all over the world will continue to gather.

[…]

It is time that all the nations of the world, in the Middle East and elsewhere, realized that Israel is here to stay. Surrounded on every side by violent hate and prejudice, living each day in an atmosphere of constant tension and fear, Israel is certain to survive the present crisis and all future crises; and all negotiations between the United States and Arab nations may as well accept that fact.

[…]

JFK: Praise for “Hadassah, the Women’s Zionist Organization of America” & The Jewish State in Palestine

Cabinet Room, 1963.10.18; recording played at the Haddasah Convention, 1963.10.27

President Kennedy praised Hadassah’s numerous programs, and explained how the Zionist organization’s efforts in the United States of America the other Zionist Entity contributed to the advancement of civil rights and the protection of civil liberties.

+ + +

ZION vs KIKERY

Christ Jesus condemned those who wanted him dead as: children of the devil, the father of lies. He warned that their Pharisees (now called “rabbis”) traverse the globe to convert others to become twice the hell-spawn that the Pharisees already are. Jews not only steal land and souls, but also words, churches, ideas, psyches. They have stolen the beautiful words “Zion” and “Israel”, and dragged them through the mud, causing them to become associated with filth, lies, theft, pillage, deception, pride and death.

ZION means:

  • The triumph of ISRAEL, which is THE CHURCH, which is THE BODY OF CHRIST (a spiritual triumph, having nothing to do with absurd, illegitimate claims to real estate)
  • The judgement of the JEWS (i.e. KIKES, Talmudists, Kabbalists, Anti-Christians, those who call themselves Jews, etc.), and their reward

For example, from Kebra Negast:

“And the Tabernacle of the Law of God, the Holy ZION, shall remain here until that day when our Lord shall dwell on Mount ZION; and ZION shall come and shall appear unto all prepared, with three seals—even as MOSES gave her—as it saith in the Old Law and in the New, “At the testimony of two or three witnesses everything shall stand.”

“And then, saith ISAIAH the Prophet, “The dead shall be raised… up, and those who are in the graves shall live, for the dew which cometh from Thee is their life.”

“And when the dead are raised up, His mercy whereby He watereth the earth shall cease; they shall stand up before Him with the works which they have done. And ENOCH and ELIAS shall come, being alive, so that they may testify, and MOSES and AARON from the dead shall live with everyone. And they shall open the things that fetter her [that fetter ZION], and they shall make to be seen the JEWS, the crucifiers, and they shall punish them and chide them because of all that they have done in perverting the Word of God.

“And the JEWS shall see what He wrote for them with His hand—the Words of His Commandment, and the manna wherewith He fed them without toil [on their part], and the measure thereof; the GÔMÔR, and the spiritual ZION, which came down for their salvation, and the rod of AARON, which blossomed after the manner of MARY.

“And He shall answer and say unto them [the JEWS], “Why did ye deny Me, and entreat Me evilly and crucify Me, seeing that I did all this for you, and that by My coming down from heaven I delivered you from SATAN and from the slavery of SATAN, and that I came for your sakes? Look ye and see how ye pierced Me with nails and thrust the spear through Me.”

“And the Twelve Apostles shall be raised up, and they shall pass judgement upon them, and shall say unto them, “We would have made you hear, but ye would not hear the prophecy of the Prophets and the preaching of us the Apostles.”

“And the JEWS shall weep and repent when it shall be useless to do so, and they shall pass into everlasting punishment; and with the Devil, their father who had directed them, and his demons who had led them astray, and with the wicked they shall be shut in.”

ZION vs KIKERY

2011.12.02

Kike’s Whore JFK on Palestine & Zionism

John F. Kennedy, Speech to the Golden Jubilee Banquet of B’nai Zion, New York City, 1959.02.09

“Our own history as a nation and Israel’s have many parallels — in the diversity of their origins, in their capacity to reach the unattainable, in the receptivity to new ideas and social experimentation…

“History records several… breakthroughs – great efforts to which spiritual conviction and human endurance have combined to make realities out of prophecies. The Puritans in Massachusetts, the Mormons in Salt Lake City, the Scotch-Irish in the Western territories were all imbued with the truth of the old Jewish thought that a people can have only as much sky over its head as it has land under its feet…

“I would like to…dispel a prevalent myth … the assertion that it is Zionism which has been the unsettling and fevered infection in the Middle East, the belief that without Israel there would somehow be a natural harmony throughout the Middle East and Arab world. Quite apart from the values and hopes which the State of Israel enshrines… it twists reality to suggest that it is the democratic tendency of Israel which has injected discord and dissension into the Near East. Even by the coldest calculations, the removal of Israel would not alter the basic crisis in the area… The basic rivalries within the Arab world, the quarrels over boundaries, the tensions involved in lifting their economies from stagnation, the cross pressures of nationalism — all of these factors would still be there, even if there were no Israel…

Israel, on the other hand, embodying all the characteristics of a Western democracy and having long passed the threshold of economic development, shares with the West a tradition of civil liberties, of cultural freedom, of parliamentary democracy, of social mobility…

“The choice today is not between either the Arab states or Israel. Ways must be found of supporting the legitimate aspirations of each. The United States, whose President was first to recognize the new State of Israel, need have no apologies – indeed should pride itself – for the action it took…

“The Jewish state found its fulfilment during a time when it bore witness, to use the words of Markham, to humanity betrayed, “plundered, profaned, and disinherited.” But it is yet possible that history will record this event as only the prelude to the betterment and therapy, not merely of a strip of land, but of a broad expanse of almost continental dimensions… [A]s we observe the inspiring experience of Israel, we know that we must make the effort…”

JFK: “America Salutes Israel”, Yankee Stadium, 1956.04.29

We are gathered here this afternoon to commemorate a notable anniversary in man’s eternal quest for freedom. For nearly 8 years ago today a state was born — and a people, rising from the ashes of history’s most ruthless persecution, entered upon a new birth of freedom. The state was the State of Israel — and the people were the children of Israel. Today, as the anniversary of that monumental event recurs for the eighth time – Israel, we salute you.

Much is different between the United States and Israel. Our Nation stretches in a great land mass between two wide oceans — the Israelis occupy a beachhead on the eastern Mediterranean. Americans number 165 million — the Israelis less than 2 million. We are the oldest Republic on earth and the youngest people — the Israelis have the youngest republic and the oldest people.

Yes, much is different — but much is the same. For both Israel and the United States won their freedom in a bitter war for independence. Both Israel and the United States acknowledge the supremacy of the moral law – both believe in personal as well as national liberty — and, perhaps most important, both will fight to the end to maintain that liberty.

I join in this salute today because of my own deep admiration for Israel and her people — an admiration based not on hearsay, not on assumption, but on my own personal experience. For I went to Palestine in 1939; and I saw there an unhappy land, ruled under a League of Nations mandate by a Britain which divided and ruled in accordance to ancient policy. And while there I was shocked by a British Foreign Office white paper just issued sharply cutting back Jewish immigration. Yes, as in the days of old, “the glory had departed from Israel.” For century after century, Romans, Turks, Christians, Moslems, Pagans, British — all had conquered the Holy Land — but none could make it prosper. In the words of Israel Zangwill: “The land without a people waited for the people without a land.” The realm where once milk and honey flowed, and civilization flourished, was in 1939 a barren realm — barren of hope and cheer and progress as well as crops and industries — a gloomy picture for a young man paying his first visit from the United States.

But 12 years later, in 1951, I traveled again to the land by the River Jordan — this time as a Member of the Congress of the United States — and this time to see first-hand the new State of Israel. The transformation which had taken place could not have been more complete. For between the time of my visit in 1939 and my visit in 1951, a nation had been reborn – a desert had been reclaimed — and a national integrity had been redeemed, after 2,000 years of seemingly endless waiting. Zion had at least been restored — and she had promptly opened her arms to the homeless and the weary and the persecuted. It was the “Ingathering of the Exiles” — they had heard the call of their homeland; and they had come — “brands plucked from the burning” — they had come from concentration camps and ghettoes, from distant exile and dangerous sanctuary, from broken homes in Poland and lonely huts in Yemen, like the ancient strangers in a strange land they had come. And Israel received them all, fed them, housed them, cared for them, bound up their wounds, and enlisted them in the struggle to build a new nation.

But perhaps the greatest change of all I found lay in the hearts and minds of the people. For, unlike the discouraged settlers of 1939, they looked to the future with hope. From Haifa to the Gulf of Akaba, from Gaza to the Dead Sea, I found a revival of an ancient spirit. I found it in Israel’s gift to world statesmanship, David Ben-Gurion. I saw it in the determined step of soldiers and workers; I heard it in the glad voices of women in the fields; I saw it in the hopeful eyes of refugees waiting patiently in their misery. The barren land I had seen in 1939 had become the vital nation of 1951.

Yes; Israel, we salute you. We honor your progress and your determination and your spirit. But in the midst of our rejoicing we do not forget your peril. We know that no other nation in this world lives out its days in an atmosphere of such constant tension and fear. We know that no other nation in this world is surrounded on every side by such violent hate and prejudice.

Will Israel fall? Will this noblest of all the 20th century’s experiments in democracy sink beneath the surface, not to rise again for still another 2,000 years? Part of the answer rests with the United States, the leader of the free world, and the godfather of the infant nation Israel. I shall not now attempt to chart our course in detail. But I shall say, and say again, that this is no time for equivocation or hesitation.

TIME FOR ACTION IS NOW

It is long past time for this Nation and others to make it absolutely clear that any aggression or threat of aggression in the Middle East will not be tolerated by the United Nations or the parties to the 1950 Tripartite Agreement. It is time that we made this so clear, in the U.N. and elsewhere, that no nation would dare to launch an attack. For it is the responsibility of our Government to make certain that neither Israel nor any small nation of the world is left defenseless without arms while neighboring states dedicated to their destruction receive unlimited quantities of Communist arms. It is time that all the nations of the world, in the Middle East and elsewhere, realized that Israel is here to stay. She will not surrender — she will not retreat — and we will not let her fall.

Today we celebrate her 8th birthday — but I say without hesitation that she will live to see an 80th birthday – and an eight hundredth. For peace is all Israel asks, no more — a peace that will “beat swords into plowshares and spears into pruning-hooks”; a peace that will enable the desert to “rejoice and blossom as the rose,” “when the wicked cease from troubling and the weary be at rest.” Then, and only then, will the world have witnessed the complete fulfillment of Isaiah’s prophecy “Tzee-Yon B’Meeshpat Teepadeh” – “Zion shall be redeemed through justice.” [n.b. See “ZION vs KIKES”, below.] And all of us here, and there, and everywhere will then be able to say to each other with faith and with confidence, in our coming and in our going: “Shalom” – peace! Peace be with you, now and forever.

John F. Kennedy, from “The Strategy of Peace”, 1960

“In 1939 I first saw Palestine, then an unhappy land under alien rule, and to a large extent then a barren land. […] In 1951, I travelled again to the land by the River Jordan, to see firsthand the new State of Israel. The transformation that had taken place was hard to believe. For in those twelve years, a nation had been born, a desert had been reclaimed, and the most tragic victims of World War II…had found a home.”

JFK, Annual Banquet of Histadrut Zionist Organization, Baltimore, Maryland, 1956.11.27

It is a genuine pleasure to be here tonight to join with you in tribute to my distinguished friend and your State Senator, Philip Goodman [KIKE, from Poland; Maryland State Senator, 1955-1960; Mayor of Baltimore, 1962-1963]. I first met Phil Goodman at the Democratic National Convention in Chicago last summer. But in that short period of time, and particularly on that occasion, I have come to know the warm loyalty of his friendship and his able determination as a political leader. His support of me at Chicago, which I did not solicit and for which he did not bargain, was one of the most gratifying surprises I received during those exciting days. And I am grateful to him for his efforts even though he did not succeed in obtaining for me the votes of the Maryland delegation — in fact, I am more grateful than ever, for if he had succeeded, I might have been made the Vice-Presidential nominee! In any event, my friendship with Phil Goodman is one of the lasting benefits for me to come out of that Convention; and I am delighted that so many of you have gathered tonight to pay him a yell-deserved tribute. Equally fitting is the dedication in his name of a hospital wing of the Medical Center in Jaffa. For his career has been one of service — service to his city, state and nation — service to the Jewish people and homeland — and service to his party and the principles for which he has fought all his life.

Politicians are always being asked to address testimonial dinners, for this individual or that, for this cause or that, to join in a lengthy procession of eulogies that are embarrassing to the subject and boring to the audience. But this is one case where I believe the cause and the individual to be worthy of every tribute we can pay — and I was delighted to come for that purpose.

I want to also take this opportunity to greet my good friend Congressman San Friedel [KIKE; U.S. Congressman, 1953-1971], in whose district this dinner is being held. His years of service to you on your City Council, in your State Legislature and as a particularly hard working Congressman have, I know, merited from you the same respect and affection he now enjoys from all of his colleagues in Washington. I amlooking forward to many more years of working in the Congress with Sam Friedel. I know that you will do your bit to make this possible, and I am hopeful the voters of Massachusetts will do their part also.

Tonight’s dinner, I understand, is the annual highlight of your Histadrut campaign here in Baltimore, which is emphasizing this year the construction of the Medical Center in Jaffa named for your great and good Dr. Herman Seidel and its new wing named for Senator Goodman. I have no doubt that the tensions and crises that now swirl about Israel and the whole Middle Eastern area have introduced a new factor into your campaign. And yet I am equally certain that those of you who are gathered here tonight will no more permit that present turmoil to lessen your concern for the people of Israel than that brave democracy has permitted its problems abroad to interfere with its humanitarian progress at home.

Whatever may be the background, the difficulties, the merits or the eventual outcome of those conflicts, we know that the State of Israel will remain — and we know that assistance from her friends in this country will still be desperately needed. The nation will continue to grow; and the exiles from all over the world will continue to gather.

[…]

It is time that all the nations of the world, in the Middle East and elsewhere, realized that Israel is here to stay. Surrounded on every side by violent hate and prejudice, living each day in an atmosphere of constant tension and fear, Israel is certain to survive the present crisis and all future crises; and all negotiations between the United States and Arab nations may as well accept that fact.

[…]

JFK: Praise for “Hadassah, the Women’s Zionist Organization of America” & The Jewish State in Palestine

Cabinet Room, 1963.10.18; recording played at the Haddasah Convention, 1963.10.27

President Kennedy praised Hadassah’s numerous programs, and explained how the Zionist organization’s efforts in the United States of America the other Zionist Entity contributed to the advancement of civil rights and the protection of civil liberties.

+ + +

ZION vs KIKERY

Christ Jesus condemned those who wanted him dead as: children of the devil, the father of lies. He warned that their Pharisees (now called “rabbis”) traverse the globe to convert others to become twice the hell-spawn that the Pharisees already are. Jews not only steal land and souls, but also words, churches, ideas, psyches. They have stolen the beautiful words “Zion” and “Israel”, and dragged them through the mud, causing them to become associated with filth, lies, theft, pillage, deception, pride and death.

ZION means:

  • The triumph of ISRAEL, which is THE CHURCH, which is THE BODY OF CHRIST (a spiritual triumph, having nothing to do with absurd, illegitimate claims to real estate)
  • The judgement of the JEWS (i.e. KIKES, Talmudists, Kabbalists, Anti-Christians, those who call themselves Jews, etc.), and their reward

For example, from Kebra Negast:

“And the Tabernacle of the Law of God, the Holy ZION, shall remain here until that day when our Lord shall dwell on Mount ZION; and ZION shall come and shall appear unto all prepared, with three seals—even as MOSES gave her—as it saith in the Old Law and in the New, “At the testimony of two or three witnesses everything shall stand.”

“And then, saith ISAIAH the Prophet, “The dead shall be raised… up, and those who are in the graves shall live, for the dew which cometh from Thee is their life.”

“And when the dead are raised up, His mercy whereby He watereth the earth shall cease; they shall stand up before Him with the works which they have done. And ENOCH and ELIAS shall come, being alive, so that they may testify, and MOSES and AARON from the dead shall live with everyone. And they shall open the things that fetter her [that fetter ZION], and they shall make to be seen the JEWS, the crucifiers, and they shall punish them and chide them because of all that they have done in perverting the Word of God.

“And the JEWS shall see what He wrote for them with His hand—the Words of His Commandment, and the manna wherewith He fed them without toil [on their part], and the measure thereof; the GÔMÔR, and the spiritual ZION, which came down for their salvation, and the rod of AARON, which blossomed after the manner of MARY.

“And He shall answer and say unto them [the JEWS], “Why did ye deny Me, and entreat Me evilly and crucify Me, seeing that I did all this for you, and that by My coming down from heaven I delivered you from SATAN and from the slavery of SATAN, and that I came for your sakes? Look ye and see how ye pierced Me with nails and thrust the spear through Me.”

“And the Twelve Apostles shall be raised up, and they shall pass judgement upon them, and shall say unto them, “We would have made you hear, but ye would not hear the prophecy of the Prophets and the preaching of us the Apostles.”

“And the JEWS shall weep and repent when it shall be useless to do so, and they shall pass into everlasting punishment; and with the Devil, their father who had directed them, and his demons who had led them astray, and with the wicked they shall be shut in.”

Kikish Krauts

2011.12.01

Kikish Krauts

The German government pushed most for the Euro. Germany was the first member-state to give up its own currency. So all their oyveying now about how the Greeks and other swarthy Mediterranean types, and the Poles, and Paddy Irishman, are all a burden on the hard-working Germans is indeed mega-chutzpah.

EU “creation”: 2001.12.31. Member-states were allowed to keep “legacy-currency” in circulation as legal tender until 2002.02.28. The official date on which the national currencies ceased to be legal tender varied in member states, but most permitted their legacy-currency to remain in circulation the full two months. The earliest date was in Germany — The Deutsche Mark officially ceased to be legal tender immediately after 2001.12.31.

The Eurozone would be a complete impossibility without German backing.

The Euro is administered by the European System of Central Banks (ESCB), which is comprised of the European Central Bank (ECB; headquartered in Frankfurt, Germany) and the Eurozone central banks. The German-dominated ECB has the sole authority to set monetary policy; other members of the ESCB participate through printing, minting, and distributing notes and coins.

Germans: “The Greeks cheated us, oy vey!, with false ecomonic data!” – Complete nonsense. The Germans knew exactly the state of every EU member-states’ economy. So their moaning now is indeed chutzpah.

[Besides that, it was Germany that pushed the most for NATO “action” in Bosnia and Kosovo, and then for the adoption of the Euro as the official currency in those client-states — and the NATO-occupied Serb province of Kosovo does use the Euro. It was Germany that fabricated the worst “evidence” of “anti-Muslim atrocities!” in Kosovo as a pretext for the invasion of Serbia.]

What’s Germany’s Long Game? — To be “forced to have to” dictate to the rest of the Eurozone:

The Kike Soros: Germany Must Dictate Terms To Europe!

SPIEGEL Interview with George Soros

‘You Need This Dirty Word, Euro Bonds’

In a SPIEGEL interview, billionaire investor George Soros criticizes Germany’s lack of leadership in the euro zone, arguing that Berlin must dictate to Europe the solution to the currency crisis. He also argues in favor of the creation of euro bonds as a way out of the turbulence.

Graphics Gallery: The Most Important Facts about the Global Debt Crisis

[ http://www.spiegel.de/fotostrecke/fotostrecke-71636.html ]

SPIEGEL: Mr. Soros, we currently see a global banking crisis, a currency crisis and a sovereign debt crisis. Has the financial dilemma become too big to handle? How can politicians on both sides of the Atlantic be expected to solve such a multitude of crises?

Soros: The politicians have not really tried to fix any crisis; they have so far tried only to buy time. But sometimes time actually works against you if you refuse to face the relevant issues and explain to the public what is at stake.

SPIEGEL: Are you talking about the Germans? Many experts think Chancellor Angela Merkel has been particularly hesitant to address the euro crisis.

Soros: Yes. The future of the euro depends on Germany. This is the point I really want to drive home. Germany is in the driver’s seat because it is the largest country in Europe with the best credit rating and a chronic surplus. In a crisis, the creditor always calls the shots. Sure, this is not a position Germany or Chancellor Merkel ever desired and they are understandably reluctant to embrace it. But the fact is that Germans are now in the position of dictating to Europe what the solution to the euro crisis is.

SPIEGEL: Why should Berlin embrace that idea?

Soros: There is simply no alternative. If the euro were to break up, it would cause a banking crisis that would be totally outside the control of the financial authorities. So it would push not only Germany, not only Europe, but also the whole world into conditions very reminiscent of the Great Depression in the 1930s, which was also caused by a banking crisis that was out of control.

SPIEGEL: What, then, needs to be done to fight this crisis?

Soros: I think there is only one choice. It is not a question of whether Europe needs a common currency. The euro exists, and if it were to break apart, all hell would break loose. Germany has to make it work. To make it work, you have got to allow the members of the euro zone to be able to refinance the bulk of their debt on reasonable terms. So you need this dirty word: “euro bonds”. But when you study what it involves to have euro bonds, you really have a problem because each European country remains in control of its own fiscal policy, and you have to rely on the country to meet its financial obligations.

SPIEGEL: Germans hate the euro bonds idea. They fear that under this scenario they will ultimately need to bail out everyone, even large nations like Italy.

Soros: That is why you need to establish fiscal rules that will ensure the solvency of every member. This should make the euro bond acceptable to German voters. Europe needs a fiscal authority that has not only financial but also political legitimacy. The difficulty is agreeing on the rules. Unfortunately, Germans have some funny ideas. They want the rest of Europe to follow their example. But what works for Germany can’t work for the rest of Europe: No country can run a chronic surplus without others running deficits. Germany must propose rules that other countries can also follow. These rules must allow for a gradual reduction in indebtedness. They must also allow countries with high unemployment, like Spain, to continue running cyclical budget deficits until they recover.

SPIEGEL: More and more economists, especially in Germany, would like to see Greece leave the European Union. Do you consider that to be a viable option?

Soros: I think that the Greek problem has been sufficiently mishandled by the European authorities that this may well be the best solution. Europe, the euro and the financial system could survive Greece leaving. It could survive Portugal leaving. And the remainder would be stronger and more easily managed. But the financial authorities have to arrange for an orderly exit in order for the European banking system to survive it. That will cost money because the European banking system including the European Central Bank has to be indemnified for its losses. Depositors in Greek banks also need to be protected. Otherwise, depositors in Irish or Italian banks will not feel safe.

SPIEGEL: Is the current crisis even worse than the one in 2008?

Soros: This crisis is still the continuation of the same crisis. In 2008, the financial system collapsed and it had to be put on artificial life support. The authorities managed to save the system. But the imbalances that caused the crisis have not been removed.

SPIEGEL: What do you mean?

Soros: The method the authorities rightly chose three years ago was to substitute the credit of the state for the credit in the financial system that collapsed. After the failure of Lehman Brothers, the European financial ministers issued a declaration that no other systemically important financial institutions would be allowed to fail. That was the artificial life support; it was exactly the right decision. But then Chancellor Merkel stated that such support would only be granted by each EU member state individually, and not by the European Union.

SPIEGEL: That undermined the concept of a strong European response to the crisis. Has that been the biggest mistake so far?

Soros: That Merkel statement was the origin of the euro crisis. It shattered the vision that the EU will protect the euro in a joint effort.

SPIEGEL: Where will the current crisis stop? Even France now seems to be threatened by a financial meltdown.

Soros: Of course it is spreading. Markets fear uncertainty. Germany has to realize that it has no alternative but to defend the euro. The longer it takes, the higher the price Germany will have to pay.

SPIEGEL: You have been very critical of how the crisis has been handled by governments. Many European citizens, however, blame speculators like you for their attempts to bring down the euro. Huge hedge funds like yours have waged massive bets against the European currency over the past year. And in recent days, several European countries have even imposed temporary bans on short selling, bets on falling share prices.

Soros: You are confusing markets and speculators. At the moment, the biggest speculators are the central banks because they are the most important buyers and sellers of currencies. Hedge funds have definitely been supplanted by central banks. Markets expect the authorities to produce a financial system that actually holds together. If there is any hole in that system, speculators will rush through that hole.

SPIEGEL: That sounds very noble. But in reality, speculation makes any crisis worse. Look at the credit default swaps (CDS) market where speculators can bet on a further decline of currencies and economies. How can that be helpful?

Soros: Of course, speculation will always make a crisis worse. If there is a weak point, it will expose it. And you are right, the CDS market is a very dangerous instrument and I think it should not be allowed. I am one of the very few people who argue that the CDS is a dangerous instrument because it is so lop-sided in favor of a negative outcome.
Any central bank should only be in charge of liquidity. Solvency is a matter for the treasury. But because there is no European treasury, the ECB was pushed into that arena. To keep the financial system alive they overstepped their limits, as the former German Bundesbank president Axel Weber pointed out, by discounting the government bonds of a country that was clearly bankrupt.

SPIEGEL: You are referring to the purchase of Greek bonds. Now the European Central Bank even started buying Spanish and Italian bonds. It is not even clear, however, if it is legally allowed to do so.

Soros: Yes, but there is a well-established conviction that the central banks always do what is necessary to keep the system going and then afterwards you then take care of the legal aspects. In a crisis, you simply do not have time to think about such concerns for too long.

SPIEGEL: The United States is drowning in even more debt than Europeans. Its economic recovery has been painful. Are we going to see a double-dip recession in the US?

Soros: The indebtedness of the US is not all that high, but if a double-dip recession was in doubt a few weeks ago, it is less in doubt now, because financial markets have a very safe way of predicting the future. They cause it. And the markets have decided that America is going to see a recession, particularly after the recent downgrade of the US by the rating agency Standard & Poor’s.

SPIEGEL: President Barack Obama has been fiercely criticized for his handling of the economy. You were one of his biggest supporters in 2008. Are you happy with his economic policy?

Soros: No, of course not. But the reality is that we have had 25 years of excesses building up in America — a combustible mix of too much credit and too much leverage. You need a long time to reverse that.

SPIEGEL: Obama tried to stimulate growth with a gigantic stimulus program which increased the national debt further. Was that a mistake?

Soros: Obama embraced the ideas of John Maynard Keynes. Basically, the analysis of Keynes is still very relevant — with one big difference between now and the 1930s. In the 1930s, governments had practically no debt and could therefore run deficits. Nowadays, all governments are heavily indebted, and that is a big change.

SPIEGEL: If Keynes were still alive, would he adjust his theory?

Soros: Definitely. He would say governments can still benefit from running fiscal deficits, but the new debt has to be invested in a way that will pay for itself. So the money spent would have to increase productivity.

SPIEGEL: The $800 billion stimulus program launched by Obama did not live up to that?

Soros: Obama’s stimulus program was not big enough and it was not directed at improving infrastructure nor human capital. So it was not productive enough.

SPIEGEL: And any further stimulus is now basically a non-starter, because the conservative majority in Congress is hell-bent on preventing it.

Soros: That is what is pushing the world towards another recession, into a double dip.

SPIEGEL: The Republicans are doing that?

Soros: Yes, but Obama is also at fault. He yielded the agenda to the Republicans. He is talking their language. The president would have to show leadership to counter the Republican wave, and so far he has not done so.

SPIEGEL: Do you think the US deserved the recent downgrade by Standard & Poor’s?

Soros: Probably not. This decision was the attempt by the rating agencies to reinvent themselves as anticipating rather than responding to changes that have occurred. So they are really basing that downgrade on the expectation that the political process will not provide the solution. Judging such political developments is a very new role for the rating agencies, though.

SPIEGEL: As an investor, do you listen to the rating agencies?

Soros: Well, I do not, but many other investors do.

SPIEGEL: The credit rating agencies are accused of exacerbating the crisis. Do you think the role of the rating agencies in the financial system needs to be scaled back?

Soros: I do not have an answer to that.

SPIEGEL: There are no alternatives.

Soros: Frankly. It is an unsolved problem in my mind

SPIEGEL: As an investor, would you still bet on the euro?

Soros: I certainly would not short the euro because China has an interest in having an alternative to the dollar. You can count on China to back the efforts of the European authorities to maintain the euro.

SPIEGEL: Is that the reason why the euro is still so strong compared to the dollar?

Soros: Yes. There is a mysterious buyer that keeps propping up the euro.

SPIEGEL: And it is not you.

Soros: It is not me (laughs).

SPIEGEL: In the end, will China be the only winner in this crisis?

Soros: China, of course, has been the great winner of globalization, and if globalization collapses, the Chinese will also be among the losers. So they have a strong interest in preserving the current global system. However, in some ways, they have been just as reluctant to accept it as the Germans. Germans have been hesitant to accept responsibility for Europe, and the Chinese have been hesitant to accept responsibility for the world. But they are both being pushed into it.

SPIEGEL: Mr. Soros, we thank you for this interview.

Interview conducted by Gregor Peter Schmitz and Thomas Schulz

http://www.spiegel.de/international/europe/0,1518,780189,00.html

Germany & France: Oy Vey, We Were Cheated, So We MUST Take More Control!

France, Germany push creation of eurozone gov’t

AP, 2011.08.18

PARIS (AP) – The leaders of France and Germany called Tuesday for greater economic discipline and unity among European nations but declined to take immediate financial measures seen by many investors as the only way to halt the continent’s spiraling debt crisis.

[…]

Chancellor Angela Merkel of Germany and French President Nicolas Sarkozy announced the results of their emergency talks in Paris.

Sarkozy called for a “new economic government” for Europe that would meet at least twice a year with European Union President Herman Van Rompuy as its head, but he offered few other details or indications that the body would have real power.

Merkel and Sarkozy also called for all eurozone nations to enact constitutional amendments requiring balanced budgets. They said they want the process completed by the summer of 2012, but it would almost certainly run into protracted political difficulties in many countries.

Both leaders said the moment was not right to replace 17 government bonds with a single one allowing weaker economies to borrow in cooperation with the powerhouse economies of France and Germany.

[…]

“We have exactly the same position on euro bonds,” Sarkozy said. “One day we could imagine them, but at the end of a process of European integration, not at the beginning.”

[…]

The two leaders also proposed a Europe-wide tax on financial transactions and pledged to harmonize their countries’ corporate taxes in a move aimed at showing the eurozone’s largest members are “marching in lockstep” to protect the euro

http://www.philstar.com/Article.aspx?articleId=717837

Merkel & Sarkojuif “Forced” to Push for more Euro-Integration, Oy Vey!

Germany, France examine radical push for eurozone integration

By Luke Baker and Julien Toyer, Reuters, 2011.11.27

BRUSSELS (Reuters) – Germany and France are exploring radical methods of securing deeper and more rapid fiscal integration among euro zone countries, aware that getting broad backing for the necessary treaty changes may not be possible, officials say.

Germany’s original plan was to try to secure agreement among all 27 EU countries for a limited treaty change by the end of 2012, making it possible to impose much tighter budget controls over the 17 euro zone countries — a way of shoring up the region’s defenses against the debt crisis.

But in meetings with EU leaders in recent weeks, it has become clear to both German Chancellor Angela Merkel and French President Nicolas Sarkozy that it may not be possible to get all 27 countries on board, EU sources say.

Even if that were possible, it could take a year or more to secure the changes while market attacks on Italy, Spain and now France suggest bold measures are needed within weeks.

As a result, senior French and German civil servants have been exploring other ways of achieving the goal, one being an agreement among just the euro zone countries.

“The goal is for the member states of the common currency to create their own Stability Union and to concentrate on that,” German Finance Minister Wolfgang Schaeuble told ARD television on Sunday.

Another option being explored is a separate agreement outside the EU treaty that could involve a core of around 8-10 euro zone countries, officials say.

An even more pressing decision faces euro zone finance ministers when they meet on Tuesday.

Detailed operational rules for the euro zone’s bailout fund, the European Financial Stability Facility (EFSF), are ready for approval, documents obtained by Reuters showed.

The approval of the rules will clear the way for the 440 billion euro facility to attract cash from private and public investors to its co-investment funds in coming weeks, which, depending on interest, could multiply the EFSF’s resources.

With Germany rigidly opposed to the idea of the ECB providing liquidity to the EFSF or acting as a lender of last resort, the euro zone needs a way of quickly calming markets, where yields on Spanish, Italian and French government benchmark bonds have all been pushed to euro lifetime highs.

Policymakers hope progress toward tougher fiscal rules will also assuage investors. Schaeuble said a Stability Union could be a decisive step to winning more confidence from the markets.

“That means that every euro zone member has to do its homework on its budget discipline. We want to ensure that through treaty changes,” he said.

RADICAL OVERHAUL

Reuters exclusively reported on November 9 that French and German officials were discussing plans for a radical overhaul of the European Union to establish a more fiscally integrated and possibly smaller euro zone.

“The Germans have made up their minds. They want treaty change and they are doing everything they can to push for it as rapidly as possible,” one senior EU official involved in the negotiations told Reuters. “Senior German officials are on the phone at all hours of the day to every European capital.”

While Germany and France are convinced that moving toward fiscal union – which could pave the way for jointly issued euro zone bonds and may provide more leeway for the European Central Bank to act forcefully – is the only way to get on top of the debt crisis, some other euro zone countries are unable or unwilling to move so rapidly toward that goal.

Not only Greece, Ireland and Portugal, which are receiving EU/IMF aid, but also Italy and Spain and some east European countries such as Slovakia, would either find it difficult under current economic conditions to meet the budget constraints Germany wants, or simply do not agree with the aim.

Consequently, the French and German negotiators are exploring at least two models for more rapid integration among a limited number of euro zone countries, with the possibility of folding that agreement into the EU treaty at a later stage.

TWO MODELS

One is based on the Pruem Convention of 2005, also known as Schengen III, a treaty signed among 7 countries outside the EU treaty but which was open to any member state to join and was later acceded to by 5 more EU states plus Norway.

Another option would be to have a purely Franco-German mini-agreement along the lines of the Elysee treaty of 1963 that other euro zone countries could also sign up to, officials say.

“The options are being actively discussed as we speak and things are moving very, very quickly,” a European Commission official briefed on the discussions told Reuters.

One source said the aim was to have the outline of an agreement set out before December 9, when EU leaders will meet for their final summit of the year in Brussels.

Sarkozy, who has made two speeches in the past two weeks highlighting the need for more rapid fiscal integration in the euro zone, and has acknowledged that it may be inevitable that a ‘two-speed Europe’ emerges, is due to make another keynote address on December 1 which could provide a platform for laying out in more detail the ideas that he and Merkel are developing.

A senior German government official denied there were any secret Franco-German negotiations, but emphasized that both countries saw the need for treaty change as pressing and were exploring how to achieve that in the best way possible.

“Germany and France are continuing to focus on proposals for a limited treaty change that can be presented at the EU summit in December,” the official said, emphasizing that there was a need to act quickly to get changes in place.

The ECB has bought the bonds of euro zone strugglers in intermittent fashion when they have reached crisis point. Economists say it has to act much more radically to turn the market tide but the central bank, and Germany, has opposed any such move. Commitments to binding fiscal rules by euro zone governments may be the cover it needs to change tack.

“If this bond run is not stopped it will really endanger the stability of the European and even the global financial system. Bold action by the ECB is definitely needed,” Peter Bofinger, one of the five “wise men” who formally advise the German government on the economy, told Irish state broadcaster RTE.

Reuters reported a similar possibility on Friday, with euro zone officials saying that if much tighter fiscal integration could be achieved among euro zone states, it would give the ECB more room to maneuver and buy sovereign bonds.

While EU officials are clear about the determination of France and Germany to push for more rapid euro zone integration, some caution that the idea of doing so with fewer than 17 countries via a sideline agreement may be more about applying pressure on the remainder to act.

By threatening that some countries could be left behind if they don’t sign up to deeper integration, it may be impossible for a country to say no, fearing that doing so could leave it even more exposed to market pressures.

“Some of this is just part of the posturing you hear — it’s pressure from Germany to go for treaty change as quickly as possible,” the official involved in the negotiations said.

“To some extent you have to see these ideas as part of the bargaining chips that are being put on the table.”

Brave White Woman Responds to the Ongoing GENOCIDE of Her People

2011.11.30

Brave White Woman Responds to the Ongoing GENOCIDE of Her People

That made her … BRITAIN’S MOST-WANTED!

“Emma West was kept in custody over fears of ‘revenge attacks’ after…British Transport officers…asked the media to…help identify her.”

‘You’re not British because you’re black’: Woman charged with racially aggravated harassment after vile rant aboard tram

  • Emma West remanded in custody ‘for her own safety’
  • Former dental receptionist remanded over ‘revenge attack’ fears

By Emily Allen, Daily Mail, 2011.11.29

A 34-year-old former dental receptionist has been remanded in custody on a racial harassment charge after video showing her allegedly abusing passengers aboard a tram while balancing a toddler on her knee appeared on the internet.

Emma West of New Addington, London, appeared before magistrates this morning charged with racially aggravated harassment following an appeal by the British Transport Police.

She was remanded in custody on Monday night ‘for her own protection’, after complaints were made in relation to the footage uploaded to YouTube.

Following an appearance at Croydon Magistrates Court, West was kept in custody over fears of ‘revenge attacks’ after the video of her rant swept the internet.

Her arrest followed an appeal by the British Transport officers who asked the media to publicise the video to help identify her.

A British Transport Police spokesman said: ‘This is in relation to an incident onboard a Croydon Tramlink.’

The video, posted on YouTube, shows a woman apparently hurling abuse at other passengers on the South London tram and making xenophobic insults.

The footage appears to have been discreetly captured by a passenger as the tram travelled from Croydon to Wimbledon.

Throughout the two minutes of footage the woman’s little boy sits nervously as his mother begins her rant.

At one point the woman declares other passengers should go back to their own country, saying they’re not British because they are black.

Onlookers appear to be uncertain whether the woman is drunk while she is making the comments.

The woman in the video says: ‘None of you are ****ing English. Get back to your own country. Sort your own countries, don’t come and do mine.

‘It’s nothing now. Britain is nothing now. Britain is **** all. My Britain is **** all.’

At one point she claims passengers in the carriage are ‘****ing burnt people.’

Already 10,000 members of the public have watched the film, after it was posted on Youtube, on Sunday, by LadyK89.

One passenger tries to confront the woman but is shouted down. The incident happened on a tram travellling between Croydon and Wimbledon

Fellow passengers watched on as the woman continued her foul-mouthed tirade

Comments by one viewer called The Specialscrew, read: ‘As a white British male, I feel disgusted to even be associated with this woman by my race and nationality.’

Earlier the British Transport Police said: ‘The video posted on YouTube and Twitter has been brought to our attention and our officers have launched an investigation.

‘At present it is not entirely clear which tram stops the offence took place between and when it occurred.

‘As a result we need anyone who witnessed this incident, or with any information that could assist our investigation – including the identity of the woman – to contact us.

‘We will not tolerate racism in any form on the rail network and will do everything in our power to locate the person responsible.’

A spokeswoman for Transport for London (TfL), said: ‘All of our customers have the right to use our services without fear of being abused.

‘TfL will not tolerate disgusting and offensive behaviour and we will work with the police to fully investigate this incident.

‘London Tramlink has a dedicated team of police officers who patrol the network and we would like to assure all our customers that we will continue to do everything we can to ensure that they can travel safely.

‘We would appeal to whoever posted the video to contact us in confidence.’

RACIST RANT: THE HORRIFIC TRANSCRIPT

The transcript of her rant reads:

‘What has this country come to? A load of black people and a load of ****ing Polish. A load of ****ing, yeah… you’re all ****ing… do you know what I mean?

‘You ain’t English. No, you ain’t English either. You ain’t English. None of you’s ****ing English. Get back to your own ****ing… do you know what sort out your own countries, don’t come and do mine.

‘It’s nothing now. Britain is nothing now. Britain is **** all. My Britain is **** all.

‘Yeah its fine. I have got a little kid here. Have respect? I have a little boy here. **** you. I dare you, I ****ing dare you.

‘Don’t watch my language. Go back to where you come from, go back to ****ing Nicaragua or where ever you come from. Just ****ing go back.

‘I work, I work, I work, this is my British country until we let you lot come over.

‘So what. It is my British country, you ain’t British. Are you British? You ain’t ****ing British. **** off.

‘You ain’t British, you’re black. Where do you come from?

‘No, someone’s got to talk up for these lot. Look the whole ****ing tram, look at them. Who is black and who is white.

‘There is all black and ****ing burnt people.’

Sorry we are unable to accept comments for legal reasons.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2067557/Youre-British-youre-black-Woman-charged-racially-aggravated-harassment-vile-rant-aboard-tram.html

The Daily Mohel forgot to transcribe the part where the Niggers say that Whites are lazy and can’t survive without Niggers to do their work for them. Like this:

Channon Christian & Christopher Newsom: Raped, Tortured, Mutilated & Murdered By Niggers

2011.11.27

Channon Christian & Christopher Newsom:

Raped, Tortured, Mutilated & Murdered By Niggers

Christopher Newsom Channon Christian

Kikes promote “Hate Crimes” Legislation as part of campaign to weaken White Christian society

Channon Christian and Christopher Newsom went on a date at a local restaurant on January 6, 2007. The young white couple were hijacked, bound and blindfolded by a gang of proud African American Queers (four sodomites and one dyke), and taken back to Lemaricus Devall ‘Slim’ Davidson’s rented house on Chipman Street.

Christian’s parents found her car abandoned two blocks away from the Chipman Street house the following Monday. An envelope recovered from the vehicle yielded fingerprint evidence that led police to Lemaricus Davidson and 2316 Chipman Street. When police went to the address on Tuesday, January 9, they found the home unoccupied and Channon Christian’s remains in a trash can in the kitchen. Christopher Newsom’s body was discovered in the ‘hood.

According to the testimony of the Knox County Acting Medical Examiner, Christopher was repeatedly raped by the black queers. He was blindfolded, gagged, his arms and feet were bound and his head covered. Then, barefoot, he was walked or dragged to a set of nearby railroad tracks, where the queers shot Christopher in the back of his head, in his neck, and in his back. Then the queers set him on fire.

Channon was sexually tortured for hours before she was murdered, the medical examiner testified. She suffered horrific injuries to her vagina, anus and mouth. She was not only raped but savaged with “an object,” possibly a broken chair leg, the doctor testified. She was beaten in the head. Some type of chemical was poured down her throat, and her body, including her bleeding and battered genital area, was likely scrubbed with the same solution — all while she was alive. She was then “hog-tied,” with curtains and strips of bedding, her face was covered tightly with a small trash bag. Her body was stashed inside five large trash bags before being placed inside a large trash can and covered with sheets. The medical examiner said that Channon died slowly, suffocating.

Niggers

Channon Christian & Christopher Newsom: Wrong Color to be Victims

The “authorities” vigorously rejected any suggestion that the crimes were examples of these “Hate Crimes” that kikes have forced legislatures to pass laws against.

  • Police Chief Sterling Owen IV said that the torture, rapes, and murders were a “random violent act.” He described the young African-American Queer’s playful activities as “a crime of opportunity.”
  • “There is absolutely no proof of a hate crime,” said John Gill, special counsel to Knox County District Atty. Randy Nichols.

It must have all been a Crime of Love.

Rape-Torture-Murder of White People Exploited as an Excuse to Control The Internet

The kike-supremacist gangsters at the Masonic “Anti-Defamation” League of B’nai Brith condemned attempts to “exploit” the murder of Channon and Christian as “reprehensible”.

ADL, 2007.05.29:

“The Anti-Defamation League (ADL) today condemned white supremacist organizations’ attempts to inflame racial tensions by asserting that two brutal murders in Knoxville, Tennessee, were hate crimes.

“The murders of Channon Christian and Christopher Newsom were horrifying crimes,” said ADL Southeast Regional Director Bill Nigut. “Attempts to exploit the murders for the purpose of undermining legitimate hate crimes prosecutions are reprehensible.”

Kikes are well-known for their deep concern for Christians.

Four of the five queers were indicted:

  • Letalvis “Rome” Cobbins [video of his testimony here & below]
  • Lemaricus Devall “Slim” Davidson, who had been released from a five-year sentence in Tennessee on a carjacking and aggravated robbery conviction on August 5, 2006
  • George Geovonni “Detroit” Thomas
  • Vanessa Coleman

Eric DeWayne “E” Boyd was arrested but not indicted by the Knox County grand jury. He was charged in a United States district court as an accessory after the fact for helping the suspects evade the police.

Please hold your breath while waiting for some Hollyjewed kike macher such as Spielberg or Geffen or Katzenberg or Jewison or Grazer or the Weinsteins to make a movie about this slaughter. You won’t have long to wait, because Kikes are well-known for their deep sensitivity to injustice and suffering. Or perhaps Spike Lee or Denzel Washington might be interested?

Channon Christian Christopher Newsom

William Dudley Pelley: “DUPES OF JUDAH: A Challenge to THE AMERICAN LEGION”

2011.11.22

DUPES OF JUDAH

A Challenge to THE AMERICAN LEGION

by Pelley of the Silvershirts

Shall we go to War this time to save Germany’s Jews or Sassoon’s Yellow River Dope Trade?

Chapter I

I want to use a little straight-from-the-shoulder language to the men of the American Legion!

I want to talk to them about the inside facts concerning a certain War that twenty years ago made it possible for them to be present Legion members. It’s as plain as the nose on anybody’s face that something like a million American lads went overseas in 1917 to fight a war, about the causes of which they knew next to nothing.

Even today, two decades after, scarcely one veteran in a thousand knows the accurate, concise, inside story of why we got into that War, who got us in, what chestnuts foreign governments pulled out of the fire — or had us pull or had us pull out — and who cracked and ate those chestnuts after we had been bamboozled into helping rake them from the coals of European conflict.

It’s time all of us had a little enlightenment on how such wars are made, who makes ‘em, and what purposes are served by concocting and launching ‘em.

We certainly know who has to fight ‘em!

Understand me, I’m no pacifist. I’m not saying that “war is terrible” or that it “sets back civilization” or that it kills off the cream and bead of a nation’s manhood while weaklings and profiteers are left to enjoy any benefits that subsequently come out of it. I think there are wars that are justified, and that certainly should be fought. I feel that I did my part in the last War, although it happened that my jerk concerned the espionage forces on the Eastern Front. What I mean to say is, I’m not writing this booklet from sentimental reasons or because my conscience hurts me that I did my World War fighting from a swivel chair. My gripe about the last War, and my gripe against the next war — which they’re now cooking up! — are based on the fact that being a reasonably sincere American, born and raised in this country and with forebears in both the Civil and Revolutionary Wars, it burns me up to see equally sincere and patriotic fighting-men hoodwinked, hoaxed and hijacked, called to the colors supposedly to scrap for the nation’s integrity, and then really used as sap cannon-fodder to stop pig-iron in a brawl from which some foreign clique profits.

In other words, I’m ready and eager to stop my share of the pig-iron when my country’s in danger or when her flag’s been insulted. But I’ve got enough gray in my hair at last not to get excited or begin any patriotic screeching when I find that my country’s been deliberately put in danger or her flag’s been insulted with malice aforethought to force her to take sides in some foreign racial squabble.

There’s considerable difference!

Right now I’m plenty hot and bothered, and writing specifically for the men of the American Legion, because I happen to know from first-hand research that a cold-blooded conspiracy is afoot to get us stirred up into fighting another foreign war — and repeating all the experiences of 1917, if you please! — for no other reason than that these radical New-Dealers have made a complete botch of their crack-pot program and are now frantically seeking an “out” to distract public attention from that failure and possible reprisals.

The plight of the Jews — in Germany — and I’m not at all ready to admit that it’s much of a plight outside of the imaginations of the paid propagandists — gives these same New-Dealers precisely the peg they need and want on which to hang a sudden program for “Americanism” and armament….

Hitler’s a “monster,” or so it stacks up to me, because he’s beaten the Jews at their own game of double-cross in Germany and they’re plenty sore about it. So they want us as a nation to go over and shellac him. Or the Sassoon Yellow-River dope trade is threatened by the Nipponese in China, and we must get busy and thrash the Mikado.

A couple of years ago the Jews were bragging that Hitler couldn’t last a year. They’d have him over-thrown in jig-time. But Hitler has lasted, and the Yidds have lost “face.” … If the Germans like Hitler, that’s their business. If the Jews don’t like him, I see no reason for making that our business.

The other day, however, a little undersized Yiddisher runt by the name of Grynszpan was put up to the job of assassinating one of the Nazi envoys to Paris — by the same Jewish big-shots who’ve been eternally plotting to overthrow the Nazi regime from the first. The runt bungled the job and shot the wrong man. He “got” an under-secretary by the name of Von Rath. Hitler’s agents smoked out exactly what had happened, and when the Nazis rioted against Jews all over, and assessed a $406,000,000 fine against ‘em as a lesson, the Jews over here said: “Swell! That sort of stuff plays right into our hands. Now watch us capitalize on it with the American sentimentalists to take the United States for a final one-way ride!”

Now don’t get me wrong! I’m no Nazi propagandist apologizing for Hitler. I don’t believe his brand of government would work for Americans any more than Stalin’s brand of government would work for Americans. But having kept up a lot of my espionage connections since the war, I know a thing or two about what goes on behind the scenes.

I know, for instance, that with the “kikes” swarming into the Federal Administration thicker than midges in fly-time, and with their hate and chagrin over Hitler added to their vast New-Deal flop, the whole Von Rath episode — coupled with Japan’s winning of the China War — give Roosevelt and his White House Sanhedrin precisely the opportunity they wanted to heat us to war fever anew and engage us with whosoever stands up to us firmest.

What I have behind my eyebrows to do first is to set forth clearly and simply — and in a way that the average Legion man and patriot can grasp — just what a mighty piece of skulduggery we were sold upon ‘in 1917, and what the “backstairs” truth was, about getting us into the muddle that killed some fifty thousand lads like you and me,

It’s a strange fact, but up till a few weeks ago I’d not been able in twenty years to find a single piece of literature that set forth in concise, understandable fashion the naked truth as to why the World War broke out at all, or why — having broken out — it lasted four years, or why it was required for us to get into it, upsetting the lives of a hundred million people, shipping a million of them overseas, and butchering fifty thousand of them just to prove that we took part in it.

Of course, the average American thinks the War broke out because the German Kaiser was getting too cocky and rattling his sabre about Europe till the Allied nations got fed up, on his bombast. Then somebody killed an Archduke at Sarajevo, and Serbia wouldn’t apologize. Russia mobilized and that scared France and England. Nobody would back down. All the Allies wanted Germany licked “that the world might be safe for Democracy.” … After the stramash had been going three years, a German U-boat sank one of our steamships, killing a bunch of important Americans. That was an insult we couldn’t overlook, so we too armed and stepped into the fray — to show we could heave pig-iron around with the best of ‘em, That’s the World War — on paper — and in the mind of the average citizen who is average because he never dreams what all these diplomatic and overseas messes are about.

I plead guilty to being as dumb as the rest of ‘em when I started for the Eastern Front in 1917. But I hadn’t been out there long before I began to learn things: things that never saw the newspapers and were rarely allowed to get into the dispatches. Being indirectly in the espionage division, of course I had the chance to learn ‘em.

After coming home, however, and living two post-war decades, I never found a dozen paragraphs, that set forth the true facts in a simple and compact manner until the other day an American-Hungarian lawyer in Cleveland by the name of Louis K. Birinyi got out a book Why the Treaty of Trianon is Void. Being a native Hungarian, Dr. Birinyi was all worked up over what happened to his country at the Peace Conference — or for that matter is still happening in the center of all this Fascist business in Europe. He sent me a copy of his book, with an exceedingly complimentary inscription on the flyleaf. I took it to bed with me one night and started to read it in desultory manner. I supposed it was “just another” of those literary post-mortems. Suddenly I found myself broad awake and paying strict attention. This Cleveland Hungarian was in possession of the facts. He was tossing ‘em out in paragraphs that scoured.

Here at last was the book, and the inside presentation that I had searched vainly twenty years to find. The Doctor wasn’t trying to sell anything. He wasn’t even trying to sell a book written by himself. He was pouring out his heartbreak on paper, over the fate of his native country, but in so doing he was spilling the beans all over the place!

I mention Dr. Birinyi’s book, not to “plug” sales for it, though it deserves all the plugging it can get, but because I propose to draw on a lot of what that Cleveland attorney has got in his pages — as well as irrefutable government documents — and I don’t want to filch his material without credit or conceal my sources. For some reason or other, I tell you, until the Birinyi book came out there had scarcely been a line published anywhere that revealed the nature of the backstairs chicanery that went on, setting Europe afire and killing fifty thousand of your buddies and mine when we ran with our own buckets to help put the blaze out.

Somehow or other, looking back on it now, this too wasn’t accident.

It was to somebody’s advantage to conceal and suppress such facts.

And they have been concealed and suppressed.

Most of you remember, I think, that Woodrow Wilson came back from the Peace Conference with a gripe to the effect that “there was a power controlling Europe with which he couldn’t cope.” I recall reading it in our American newspapers at the time, and have heard constant references to it since. Well, with all the high jinks that are going on at present — about which I know so much that I might sleep a whole lot better o’ nights if I knew less — I make the fair deduction that the same “power” that Wilson confessed he couldn’t cope with, might have had a lot to do with seeing to it that the real story behind the World War and our share in it, has been kept under pot-lid and the odor of what was in the pot never allowed to reach the public nostrils.

Before I’ll see the same gang put it over on us again, and send another fifty thousand fine lads to die in Europe in a repeat performance, I’ll take the pot-cover off myself.

Whether you men of the American Legion can “take it” or not, remains to be seen. Some of you will undoubtedly get plenty sore. It always makes a real American sore to find that somebody has played him for a sucker.

My contention, based on the facts that I’m going to give you, is that all of us — not only the lads of the American Legion but the entire American people — were played for suckers in 1917 and that the same conniving crowd is now out to play us for suckers again.

However, to the hot stuff….

Chapter II

Ever since the Armistice, it’s a recognized fact, nation after nation — and whole blocs of nations — have been as voluble as an equal number of old women in a small-town sewing circle, trying to explain who was responsible for the War. Germany was responsible for the War, said the British. Russia was responsible, said the German monarchists. When the crowd of burglars at the Peace Conference got around the table to divide up the territory of the Central Powers between themselves, they alibied what they were doing by declaring that Austria-Hungary was responsible for the War — because her government insisted on an apology from the Serbs for the death of an Archduke.

Every nation on earth, at some time or other it appears, has been charged with responsibility for the World War. Every people who ever came within sound of a whiz-bang or kicked in ten cents to save a flock of starving war orphans, has been charged with responsibility for the World War. The only people to date who haven’t been charged with such responsibility, is the crowd that was responsible. And its chief job in life has been to cover up.

Perhaps you may ask, “Why go into that? What does it matter who was responsible at this late day?” I tell you that it makes a whale of a lot of “matter,” in view of the fact that the same mob, never having been exposed, is up to its former tricks and popping all its trouser-buttons right now to stage a repeat performance!

Of all the statesmen of the warring countries, Lloyd George of England is the only one left who dared indicate that somebody caused the war who hasn’t to date been named. On one occasion he apologized for all the statesmen of all the warring countries by saying that “nobody quite meant war.” … Here is his blurb, uttered on December 23, 1920, to the Empire Parliamentary Association: “The more one reads memoirs and books written in the various countries of what happened before August, 1914, the more one realizes that no one at the head of affairs quite meant war. It was something into which they glided, stumbled and staggered.”

On January 6, 1923, in a syndicated article he said: “The more one examines the events of July, 1914, the more one is impressed with the shrinking of the nominal rulers of the attacking empires, and with the relentless driving onward of the military organizations behind these terror-stricken dummies. No one ever believed that the cause of the war was the shooting of the Grand Duke of Austria.”

In other words, it wasn’t kings and kaisers and Prime Ministers and Chancellors who brought on the Big Slaughter. These were just poor dummies and stooges. No, it was militarism that brought on the War, militarism that originated of itself, that expanded of itself, that moved onward of itself, and that finally shot itself oil with scarcely an erring human hand to guide it.

What a lovely blob of hooey!

“No one at the head of affairs quite meant war. The “nominal rulers,” those “terror-stricken dummies,” could not of their own will make war. Emperors, diplomatists and statesmen were unable to prevent war. “The relentless driving onward of the military organizations behind these terror-stricken dummies” forced the war ahead.

In other words, little male children of the American Legion, if you have one Winchester rifle hung on a peg in your home it isn’t particularly dangerous, either to you or to society; but if you get a big bankroll, and once a week for a period of years buy another Winchester rifle until your house is so filled with them that you can’t eat or sleep there, the moment will arrive when those guns of themselves will all want to go bang-bang! They are not so much lumber in the stocks that might otherwise make chair-legs, or so much iron in the barrels that might otherwise make engine-housings. By the sheer fact of being wood and iron, brought together in the pattern of firearms, they all would a-hunting go and blow the eternal gizzards out of anyone in front of ‘em ! That’s what the Lloyd Georges ask us to believe in regard to world armament.

“Wait a minute,” begs the stickler for facts. “You’re not quite right. Of course numbers of guns don’t make them explode of themselves. What Lloyd George meant to say, and practically did say, was that the existence of great military organizations and over-equipped armies, made the leaders of those armies just naturally want to fight. It’s the same as putting a loaded revolver in a man’s hand. He wants to sight along the barrel and pull the trigger, just to see if it will shoot!”

That’s generally the idea of how it is, when Militarism comes in for a raking. And the nitwits nod their heads in approval. But let’s not go off half-cocked. Let’s look at this thing.

The “existence of great military organizations makes, them want to fight.” … Is that so? Ho! … and likewise Hum! Well, why doesn’t someone name the specific gentlemen in the British Army, or the German Army, or the French Army, or even in our American Army, who prior to 1914 were so bursting with over-equipped combativeness that the world just had to fight. Was it Lord Kitchener? Was it Field Marshal Haig? Was it Ludendorff or Hindenburg? Was it Papa Joffre or Marshal Foch? Right here at home, have we ever observed that men like General Leonard Wood, Blackjack Pershing, or General MacArthur, ever spoiled for a scrap just because they headed up big numbers of fighting-men? Isn’t it a fact that the big-shots at the heads of military machines deplore the whole business, and feel their responsibilities heaviest to keep men out of war?

Or go on down through the ranks of any army.

Specifically in the World War — or before it — was it the colonels, the majors, the captains, the first and second lieutenants, or the top-sergeants, who wanted the war? If so, may we ask since when did emperors, diplomatists, prime ministers and generals harken to the gripes of colonels, majors, captains and top-sergeants, that a war should be started so that they could bang-off their fire-sticks? Applesauce!

Someone, somewhere, was responsible for creating those great military machines because someone, somewhere, expected to use ‘em! In this day and age, kings and kaisers and prime ministers and chancellors don’t run amuck up and down the earth, doing as they please in international diplomacy. They find themselves quickly accountable to parliaments, reichs, and congresses. The Kitcheners, Haigs, Ludendorffs, Foches and Pershings don’t run amuck with the military machines which they head, and force the kings and kaisers to fight; they simply follow orders — like the buck private at the bottom of the system.

If nobody issued the orders from a higher source, then there would never be a war. That’s common sense! So, if we go up the line, past the sergeants and captains and majors and colonels and generals and chancellors and prime ministers and kaisers and kings, and find each of these accountable to some embodiment of authority that’s still higher, we must come to the parliaments and reichs and congresses. Were they responsible for the World War? Well, whether or not they were, let’s ask ourselves what these parliaments and reichs and congresses are, but aggregations of people’s representatives. But did they represent common citizens who wanted to get into uniforms and carve the viscera out of folks across each border? We all know what a howl went up from the masses as the war-clouds mounted higher!

No! — midway between the citizenry that had to take time off from private pursuits to march forth and get shot, and the political and military bigwigs who took orders from representative parliamentary bodies and carried ‘em out, was some provocative influence that convinced the people’s representatives in all nations that war was necessary and inevitable. After the convincing had been done — in other words, when the militarism had been set in motion — the rest was executive detail carried into action.

It’s squarely on the shoulders of this Provocative Influence that we can pin the World War’s responsibility — just as we can pin additional responsibility right at this moment on the Provocative Influence now working overtime to touch off a Second World War.

This reasoning is sound, little male children of the American Legion!

Now let’s dig into cold, irrefutable, historical fact and see what the Provocative Influence was, behind the parliaments, reichs, congresses, and political and military big-shots twenty years ago, that ultimately landed most of you in France and kept fifty thousand of you there as very permanent guests….

Chapter III

Those of us who went overseas and had any contact whatever with the folks of the embattled nations, will be inclined to agree that no particular country or its nationals wanted, caused, or started the World War. It is more or less true that the “nominal rulers,” the “terror-stricken dummies,” the emasculated diplomatists and statesmen, were unable to prevent the War’s outbreak. And yet we do know that the military organizations of all the warring countries were plenty active in preparing for the War, no matter what the emperors, kings, kaisers, diplomatists, or statesmen said, thought, or intended. But these military organizations were merely instrumentalities — effective tools in the hands of some heretofore unmentioned and unseen power. We now summon to our aid the history of Europe. What the statesmen refused to disclose, history commences to reveal.

And the first revelation we come upon, and are obliged to consider, has to do with Money!

Wars can’t be fought without spondulics. Someone must put up the cash, or be willing to put up the cash, or the kings, diplomatists and statesmen must know where the cash is, whether it comes forth willingly or has to be conscripted. If the bankers of a nation — any nation! — don’t want an offensive war, or if they’re convinced that war means loss to their coffers, make no mistake about it, they’re in a position to stop it before it’s even talked about. If you think I’m talking through my hat in this, or want to advance the argument that “it doesn’t cost anything to kill a man,” I respectfully refer you to any good history of the House of Rothschild.

I haven’t seen any history of the House of Rothschild yet that hasn’t contained gloating statements concerning the numbers of times since the beginning of the 19th century that rulers have approached the House of Rothschild for cash for wars. If the Rothschilds decided that the wars looked profitable to themselves, they arranged for the payments and the wars came pronto! If the Rothschilds decided there wouldn’t be a whole lot gained, financially, or the risks were too great, or they didn’t happen to have the mazuma on the nail at the moment, the rulers went away with a polite turn-down. And there was no conflict!

From the very beginning of the history of the House of Rothschild — founded on the cash which George III paid the German Landgrave for the “loan” of the Hessian soldiers that composed the bulk of the “British” forces in our American Revolution — that particular Yiddisher financial family has been bankers to the political and military potentates of Europe. At least Central Europe!

The Rothschilds, of course, are mainly German Jews. Such German Jews, together with Polish Jews and Russian Jews, we call Ashkenazim.

Ashkenazic Jews, in other words, are the Jews of Germany, Poland, and Russia — with a strong strain of Oriental blood from the Genghis Kahn infusion. When they combine their Hebrew with the German, Polish, or Russian tongues, they get a polyglot language that is popularly called “Yiddish.” So it’s entirely proper to refer to these oriental Jews as “Yiddishers.”…

But we shouldn’t gallop away with the idea that the Yiddisher Rothschilds compose the only mob of Jews overseas that’s got money — big money! There are two or three other Jewish fortunes overseas, of which you don’t hear so much.

There’s the money of the Samuel family that controls the Dutch Shell Oil Company — in fact, most of the British oil interests in the Levant. There is the money of the Sassoon clan that controls the vast Indian and Chinese dope trade. There is the Mond fortune, the Isaacs fortune, Lord Reading’s — and finally the Montagu fortune, Montagu Norman being head of the Bank of England itself.

I heard a British intelligence officer remark once in a casual conversation that the fortune of the Samuel family — headed up by the “Right Honorable” Herbert Samuel, made a Viscount, if you please, last year! — was greater than Morgan’s, greater than Rockefeller’s, greater than Ford’s.

These five great families of so-called English Jews — English only because they have resided in Great Britain for generations and intermarried with impoverished English aristocrats — aren’t Ashkenazim. In other words, they haven’t got the Oriental, Russian, German, or Polish strain in ‘em.

No! All these families, whose vast wealth absolutely dominates the Bank of England, are more accurately classed as Sephardim. They’re so-called white Jews — or Jews who a couple of hundred years ago started to interbreed with the more Aryan races of Spain, Italy, Portugal, and France. Finally when they got across to England, they became English jews — as we know ‘em. Their Spanish, Italian, Portuguese, French and English bloods predominate over their Jewish blood. This gives them the notion that they are very high-class indeed. The big hooked nose which the Ashkenazic Jew acquired from the Assyrian — “schnozzle” if you please! — is missing in the Sephardic Jew. Physically, excepting a certain rubbery cunning about the expression of the eyes, he’s come to appear like a Spaniard, an Italian, a Portuguese, a Frenchman, or an Englishman.

Such persons as Disraeli in yesterday’s generation, or Barney Baruch, George Arliss, Sam Insull, or even Franklin D. Roosevelt — whose true ancestral name has come to light under the investigations of the Carnegie Foundation as Rossocampo-Rosenvelt — are outstanding specimens of the Sephardic Jew.

There is furthermore this difference between the Ashkenazic Jew and the Sephardic Jew:

The Ashkenazic Jew holds in the main that world Jewry is a race — a political race, so to speak. The Sephardic Jew holds in the main that world Jewry is a religious denomination.

Both of these claims are capital expediencies when Jews as Jews are having the squeeze put on them for predatory tactics against Gentiles —

The Ashkenazim shriek “Racial persecution!” The Sephardim screech “Religious intolerance!” Both of these about cover the situation….

Now, broadly speaking, here’s the way we can boil down the money-banker situation as it existed on the Continent prior to 1914: The Ashkenazic Rothschilds had the big bank roll behind Germany and the Central Powers; the Sephardic Samuels had the big bank roll behind France, England and the Allies. A perfectly gorgeous set-up it was, for a knock-down drag-out fight, when we take into consideration one of the outstanding differences of temperament existing between these two Jewish factions —

Believe it or not, but up to the time when all world Jewry was threatened because of the Nazi ascendancy in Central Europe, the Sephardic Jews looked upon the Ashkenazic Jews with an intolerance and detestation only comparable to the Nazi attitude toward Jews in the Fatherland!

The Sephardic Jews, as I said, considered themselves the aristocrats of World Jewry — because of their heavy infusion of Aryan blood and their more aesthetic temperament. To them, the Yiddishers were “just human trash” and we don’t have to probe far into the annals of Jewry to recognize what a tragedy it was considered, when a Sephardic Jewess fell in love with, and married, an Ashkenazic boy.

Do you know where the slang term “Kike” came from? I’ll tell you, and you can take my word for it that I’m speaking without bias. The slang term “Kike” is a Sephardic-Jewish epithet originated by that caste of Jewry to describe the schnozzle-faced quasi-oriental Ashkenazim whom it detests!

Although few Gentiles have had cause to be aware of it, the feud between the Sephardim and Ashkenazim, over the past two hundred years, has been strong and bitter.

Of course there was inter-marrying, and inter-financing between the two groups. But in the main the animosity was something that had to be reckoned with, in Mitteleuropa’s politics.

With this racial background roughly painted in, now we can go one step further and see how these two groups of Jewry influenced overseas affairs before 1914….

Chapter IV

Back in 1815, at the close of the Napoleonic Wars and before the House of Rothschild was as powerful as it later became, the Congress of Vienna divided up Europe and bartered millions of human beings to the victorious military commanders who had put the squelch on the Little Corporal. Naturally a storm of bitter protest was heard in every corner of the Continent. It took fifty years for the peoples of Europe — after much privation, starvation, and bloodshed — to correct the evils committed by the Congress of Vienna. Germany was consolidated and Italy was unified. The industries of Germany started to boom. So too did the size of the Rothschild fortune. The greater bulk of it was invested in industrial securities in Germany and Austria-Hungary, or in ownership of coal and iron mines and transportation facilities.

In consequence of all this, the territory of Germany began to show itself as too small to absorb her industrial products. An outside market had to be secured — in fact, if her industries were to sell goods and pay proper dividends, the markets of all the world had to be opened to “Germans” … a camouflage word for the sponsoring Rothschilds!

On the other hand, over in Holland and England, the white Sephardic Jews had their money invested heavily in British and Dutch securities. Moreover, their trade was already world-wide and the British into whose official government they were infiltrating — quite as brazenly as they have lately infiltrated into the American government under Roosevelt — had a tradition of “ruling the waves.”

Thus a trade war was inaugurated, bloodless at first, between the great vested interests of Ashkenazic-Jewish Germany and the great vested interests of Sephardic-ruled Britain. The two mighty divisions of World Jewry were slashing and hacking at each other but letting the “German” and “English” people each think that the other as nationals were out to “do” them.

Now get this, little male children of the American Legion, and let it sink in, for this is the reason that you went overseas to fight in a war — Ashkenazic-Germany’s only entrance into the Atlantic Ocean was through the English Channel. Passage of German ships through the Channel was possible only by the consent of Sephardic-Jewish England. This being clear enough, England and Germany (Gentile) began to build battleships to unheard-of proportions. But it was soon discovered that battleships wouldn’t secure to Ashkenazic-Jewish Germany the freedom of the seas which the Rothschild interests wanted, or the free and unmolested movement of international trade. Therefore, the Ashkenazic Jews of Rothschild-dominated Germany conceived the idea of building a railroad.

It was to become called in time the Berlin-Bagdad Railroad! It was to lead from Berlin down into Austria-Hungary, through the Balkans and into Turkey — ending in Bagdad, in Asia.

Over this railroad, Ashkenazic-Jewish Germany could reach the larger portion of the world’s population and transact most of the international commerce of the world without interference from the Sephardic Jews of Britain.

That is to say, whoever would have control of the Berlin-Bagdad Railroad would have control of the greatest bulk of the international commerce of the world. But the control and successful operation of the Berlin-Bagdad Railroad necessitated the control of the territories through which it passed.

Therefore the plan of “Mitteleuropa” was conceived!

Germany, Austria-Hungary, the Balkans, and Turkey, were to be controlled by the owners of the Berlin-Bagdad Railroad — that is, the Ashkenazic Rothschilds.

The “Pan-German Movement,” the shibboleth of “Deutschland Uber Alles,” and all those other idiotic utterances which the Jews love so dearly to put into the mouths of Gentiles, were slogans for this plan. The “integrity” of the Austria-Hungarian monarchy was indispensable, therefore Hungary was forced under the despotic control of the Austrian Crown.

While the plan of the Berlin-Bagdad Railroad was being promoted, however, another movement got under way. It came from Russia. On paper it was called the “Pan Slavic Movement.”

Russia, a big and rich country, had no ice-free outlet to the high seas. The Baltic is frozen during the greater part of the year. The Black Sea is an inland waterway and its only outlet to the Mediterranean Sea is at Constantinople. To secure this outlet, Russia would have to control the Dardanelles and a part of the Balkans.

In 1877, Russia had made an effort to obtain control of this outlet, and declared war upon Turkey under the still popular pretext that “the Turks had mistreated the Christians” in the Balkans. Turkey was thrashed, the “Christians” were forgotten, but Constantinople was seized by Russia.

Now mark this —

A growing feud was arising between the Jews of the world, particularly the Ashkenazic Jews, and the Throne of the Romanoffs. Russia as an empire was so vast, her resources so tremendous, and her government so absolute, that the Jews couldn’t get their talons into her flesh as they had into Germany’s or England’s. The Czar’s government rarely had to borrow money from Continental Jewish pawnbrokers — whom Father Coughlin designates so courteously as “the international bankers” — or if it did, it never met with much embarrassment paying such loans back. Furthermore, because the Czar’s military commanders found that wherever Jews were domiciled near army cantonments they invariably sold military secrets to Russia’s enemies, and still further, because Jewish loan sharks were foreclosing mortgages on vast areas of the land of ignorant peasants, the Czar’s government had issued some particularly strong edicts against the Jews, which made that race view the Romanoffs with deadly hatred.

They were out to “get” the Romanoffs, and in the end they succeeded — the Lenin-Stalin government of Bolshevia being the achievement. We’ll come to that later.

The Romanoffs were by no means fools, and they kept accurate track of what these international mischief-makers proposed to do in the matter of splitting Europe from Berlin to Bagdad with a railroad. The Czar’s government saw immediately that if the Rothschilds got their railroad down to Bagdad, they would have the first clutch at Russia by shutting off her world commerce and commence to make her pay through the nose.

To go back to 1877, however, when Russia thrashed Turkey and got control of the Dardanelles, the Ashkeniazic Jews of the central European countries were furious. So for once they made common cause with the Sephardim of England — the Sephardic Jew, Disraeli, being English Prime Minister at the time — and presented to the British Gentiles that Russia in control of the Dardanelles was a menace to Britannia’s ruling the waves. Therefore it wasn’t difficult to get the British to step into the Turkish situation and force the Czar to relinquish.

Take note that even back there in those days, the common soldiers — fellows like ourselves — who had fought and bled and died that Russia might shellac Turkey, made their “sacrifices” all in vain when the Jews of the world had a plan to work out to promote their own interests.

England blocked the scheme of Russia to get an ice-free outlet to the high seas, and this act caused Russia to become the sworn enemy of what appeared — on the surface to be Germany, Austria, and England. Truly it caused Russia, or the monarchy of the Romanoffs, to become the sworn enemies of the Jews who controlled Germany, Austria, and England — Ashkenazim and Sephardim alike.

Right there, in that situation, lay the “makin’s” of the war that all the weak-kneed diplomatists and statesmen of the world have been charging up to the militarists and German monarchists. Right there, in that situation, lay the “makin’s” of the conflict that you and I — in utter ignorance of all this internal Jewish skulduggery — were persuaded to go overseas and fight under the slogan that we were going “to make the world safe for Democracy.”

Sheep-dip!

Chapter V

So in those peaceful years before 1914, the big Rothschild Jews of Germany were going ahead with their plans for a Berlin-Bagdad Railroad that was to bottle up Russia at the Dardanelles and smash the world-wide commerce of the French and English Sephardic Jews of Paris and London. If, however, Germany could be “isolated,” or a first-class war made to break out that ended with the everlasting daylights walloped out of her, then the construction of this Berlin-Bagdad project could be effectively “dynamited.”… The English Sephardim were past masters at the job of building “coalitions,” and they had the money to act as pay-mistress of Britain’s “allies.”… Why not, with the Bank of England in their control? Furthermore, the Sephardic Jews of France were more closely related to them than the quasi-oriental “kikes” of Germany and Austria.

On the other hand, Russia hated those same “kikes” of Germany more than she did the Sephardim of England.

So many minor differences with France were patched up, and in 1904 the two predominantly Sephardic countries entered into a combination, against the Ashkenazic countries-called the Entente Cordiale. But the Ashkenazic crowd saw the jam they were making for themselves, and engineered the Triple Alliance — Germany, Austria-Hungary, and Italy.

For this combination, the Entente Cordiale was no match. Therefore the Sephardim of England, working through their Gentile Fronts of aristocratic British old-family statesmen, enticed Russia to join the Entente Cordiale, and thus the Triple Entente was formed — England, France, and Russia — the “Allies” to you!

Russia’s entry into the Triple Entente was obtained by reason of the fact that the plan for the Berlin-Bagdad-Rothschild railway crossed up the Russian plan of reaching an outlet to the Mediterranean Sea. The railway was to cross the Turkish Channels at Constantinople, where Russia planned to reach the sea. Thus, with the help of Gentile Czardom, Sephardic England could effectively block the development and completion of the Rothschild project that otherwise would have put both Romanoffs and Sephardim at the mercy of the Ashkenazim.

Here we have a complete picture of the European Situation. And if you think I’m hatching it’ up out of my own brain, let me tell you that a lot of what I’m giving you can be found in Document 346 of the records of the 67th Congress of the United States. Only it won’t do you any good to go writing to Washington for Document 346. Believe me, although done at the government printing office, it’s long since been “exhausted.” And never reprinted! You bet it wasn’t!

From 1907 to 1914, Europe was divided into two powerful camps: the Triple Entente — “Allies” to you, again ! — guarding the interests of the Romanoffs and the Sephardim, and the Triple Alliance — the “Central Powers ” — guarding the Berlin-Bagdad-Rothschild scheme to thus get the Romanoffs and the Sephardim over a barrel.

Of course, both camps saw to it that the Gentile nations involved armed themselves to the teeth. With these big capitalistic Jews practically dictating to the press — exactly as they’re doing here in the United States at the present moment — this was a push-over. The poisoned pen was put to work and virulent propaganda put into operation to create the maximum of international hatred. The Ashkenazim told the gullible Germans that France and England were out to “do” ‘em, deny ‘em a place in the sun, and steal their colonies. “Gott strafe England!” was the slogan fed to the poor Heinies for breakfast, dinner, and supper. The common people of England, France, and Russia, did not know what or who was behind all the arming of Germany. The Kaiser was just the semi-paralytic figure-head that went about thinking he bossed the Fatherland. But he personalized “German aggression,” and the English and French Gentiles fell for the hoax by the millions. Why not, when they couldn’t get any other information? The Sephardim went the Ashkenazim ten better, in cooking up propaganda, for they had the most at stake if the latter won out.

In England, the big-shot Sephardic Jew at the head of the British press was Lord Northcliffe, who early in life had taken the Aryan name of Alfred Harmsworth. He played the game of the Sephardic-Samuels crew to the limit, creating a psychology throughout the British Empire that war was “inevitable.”

Sure it was “inevitable ” — because the Ashkenazic mob was determined to use the armies of German Gentiles to fight for its project to a finish, and the Sephardim were just as determined that they were going to use the armies of English, French — and later American — Gentiles to see that the Ashkenazim were stopped.

It was “inevitable” in Jewish minds only, and for Jewish purposes and profits. Today, here in America, we’re witnessing the same sort of satanic skulduggery as night after night our newspapers tell us that war against both Hitler and Japan is “inevitable.”

More sheep-dip!

Here’s an interesting sidelight on how much the dummy rulers of the later-embattled peoples wanted war.

Did you know that back in November, 1910, while the (Jewish) subsidized press of each of the countries to be involved were feeding their poison of international hatred to their readers, and while the uniformed imbeciles and paid stooges of these Jewish blocs were shouting for war, two rulers — the Emperor of Germany and the Czar of Russia — sat quietly down to a lunch-table in Potsdam and earnestly discussed ways and means to avert the threatened hostilities?

There at a lunch-table, undisturbed by the howlings of the Jew-paid war maniacs, these two rulers worked out between themselves a just basis for a peaceful existence of the two countries. Germany was to acknowledge Russia’s control over access through Persia to the high seas, and Russia — at least the Romanoff court — was to withdraw her opposition to the “German” plan of building the Berlin-Bagdad Railroad.

This is history, and the event is of historical importance! Civilized mankind might ponder it with great moral benefit. The two rulers came together, without any Yiddisher or Sephardic kibitzers present — just as Hitler, Mussolini and Chamberlain did the other day over in Munich — and settled a vexatious problem, or so they supposed, by a peaceful two-hour discussion over a lunch-table. If this could he done, and was done, why was a disastrous four-year war sprung upon the nations of the world?

The answer is simple —

What these “dummy” rulers said or did was no part of the schemes, rivalries, and hatreds of these swollen-with-power Jewish financial groups. The quasi-oriental Ashkenazim were out to smash or harness the Sephardim in the matter of international trade and finance. And the means that each side proposed to use in the final extremity was the Gentile armies of the countries involved. Therefore the agreement of the Kaiser and the Czar not to fight and thus commit national suicide, was “frustrated.”…

In other words, when the show-down came, they had precious little to say about it. The Kaiser’s court was almost entirely staffed with big-shot Ashkenazic Yiddishers. The Barney Baruch of Germany in those days was the Jew Walter Rathenau. This was the same Jew who shipped Lenin across Germany in the latter days of the war, to overthrow and exterminate the Romanoffs. “Three hundred men,” he once said, “not generally known to the public, govern the fate of Europe!” He did not add that the three hundred were big-shot Jews or that kaisers and czars were by no means among them.

Here’s another instance —

In order to fight a war in Europe to determine whether or not the Rothchilds’ Berlin-Bagdad Railroad was going through, there had to be people who wanted war, and armies and navies which would do the fighting, and finally, money on which to finance it. France and England had the armies, navies, and money, but no people who wanted war. Germany had all the requirements because there the Jews were more firmly entrenched in official positions. But the Sephardic financiers began their “financial mobilization” in that they quietly began recalling any loans they had in Germany. And the German financiers just as quietly began to cache their war boodle outside of Germany, knowing that the fighting might come in that country and their money be subject to seizure. When the German Kaiser called together the “German” financiers just after the abortive Morocco Incident and asked them to prepare Germany’s finances for war, the “German” financiers politely informed them that there would be no war because the “German” gold was at that time out of Germany. That settled the question of war. The Gentiles of France and England hadn’t been sufficiently steamed up to the point where such a war would gain the objectives that the Jews desired.

So you see, little male children of the American Legion, what is revealed when the curtain is rolled back and the “international financiers” — in other words, world-plotting Yidds! — are discovered in their true roles. They did not recognize the “opportunity” for war to be “favorable,” and there was no war.

The “inevitable” outbreak of the war came when the world-plotting Yidds decided that propaganda in all countries had the Gentiles plenty heated up so that their war would not misfire. Serbia particularly was made a hot-bed of poisonous propaganda. The Serbian propagandists invaded Austria and Hungary, poured out money like water, and created disturbances. International hatred in France — against “the Huns” — was worked up to hysterical pitch. War was in the air. War “had to come.” Only a good pretext had to be found.

In 1912-13 another attempt was made to “feel out” the people and to test the time, whether or not it was favorable for conflict. The Balkan War broke out. Russia and Austria mobilized. But the opportunity was “not favorable” and there was no war till the following August.

But the agitation continued — exactly as the Roosevelt-Jewish crowd is keeping up the agitation here today for a mix-up with Germany and Japan. Each nation sold its people on the “necessity” for arming to the teeth. The peoples of every nation were groaning under the weight of heavy armaments, but the Invisible Power (Jewish) continued with feverish energy the preparation of the public mind for the conflict that was coming.

This propaganda assumed such alarming proportions that on one occasion the Gentile Lord Welby, of the English Treasury, cried: “We are in the hands of an organization of crooks!” Sure he was! Jewish crooks! The Rothschilds had to be kept from building a railroad, though a dozen nations were wrecked in doing it!

The drive to create the pretext for war was now concentrated in Serbia. The foci of trouble were recognized again at the intersection of “German” and Russian plans. To force the issue, Hungary was terrorized by the Serbian propagandists and agents provocateur. Finally the directors of the plan resorted to plain murder.

Two young Jews, misnamed “students,” were selected and carefully trained by “Serbian” officials, and supplied with weapons of murder from the arsenals of Serbia, and then sent out on their villainous journey.

On June 28, 1914, these two young Heebs assassinated the Archduke Franz Ferdinand of Austria, together with his wife at his side.

Thus by a carefully planned murder, the fuse was lit and the great conflagration started.

The plan for the murder was hatched in Serbia. But get this, little male children of the American Legion — The bill for the job was paid from London.

Were the Sephardim on the job of smashing the Rothschilds’ railroad scheme — or were they not?

The payment was made directly through the Serbian Legation stationed at London. In proof of this statement, John Bull, an English publication, printed a letter written on the official sheet of the Serbian Legation at London, date April 5, 1914 — note that date! — which, decoded, read as follows —

For the elimination of F. F. (Franz Ferdinand,) the sum 2,000 pounds sterling, will be paid as follows: 1,000 pounds on your arrival in Belgrade (capital of Serbia) by the hands of Mr. G and the rest of 1,000 pounds on finishing the work paid as above. The sum of 200 pounds for expenses and to pay agents.

In other words, the young Jew Princip, who fired the shot that started the world war and in due course of time made you American Legionnaires when your country had been propagandized into joining all the brilliant business, got ten grand in American cash for the murder, and one grand for the expense of getting to Belgrade from London.

And they talk about Germany’s having started the war! — not that I’m doing any apologizing for Germany, but the facts are the facts!

The fuse was lit. The German Emperor frantically sent his telegrams to the Czar begging him to avert the catastrophe. The Czar as frantically replied that the German Kaiser should stop the war. The French and English statesmen kept the wires sizzling, appealing to all and sundry to stop the war. But war had to come. The Ashkenazim and Sephardim had fixed it all up so that war was “inevitable.”… As Lloyd George said, the “terror-stricken dummies” could not stop the war.

The uncrowned and invisible rulers of Europe (Jewish) decreed that there should be war. And there was war! And was it a war?

You American’ Legion lads should know! You went out and did your share of stopping the German pig-iron, that the Rothschild railroad should become a flop!

Chapter VI

Now, having said this much, I’m going, still further and tell you lads more, of what patsies these big-shot Jews made of you, that the world might be kept safe for Sephardic Democracy.

The War had scarcely been going a year, and English Tommies and French poilus were still wondering “what it was all about,” when the Sephardic Jews of the Allied nations got together and signed among themselves what they called the Treaty of London.

This Treaty of London, entered into by the Allied Powers on April 26, 1915, proved definitely that the main purpose of the whole stramash was to exterminate the power of the German “kike.”

In that Treaty, central Europe and a part of Asia were divided and distributed among England, France, Italy, Rumania, Russia, Serbia, and Montenegro, as follows —

England was to receive the neutral zones of Persia, southern Mesopotamia and Bagdad — all with their heavy oil deposits, and a portion of the German colonies.

France was to get Syria and the oil fields of Mosul, Alsace-Lorraine and the Saar Valley — rich in iron mines and smelters, temporary occupation of the left bank of the Rhine, and a goodly chunk of the German colonies;

Italy was to receive the Trentino, Triest and Istria, a generous share of the Dalmatian coasts, Smyrna and its hinterland, and numerous islands too bothersome to mention — in lieu of all which, she deserted the Entente Cordiale as most of us recall;

Russia was to receive Constantinople and nearly the whole of Turkey in Europe, the Bosporous, the Dardanelles, and the Sea of Marmora, and full liberty of action in Persia.

Serbia, Rumania, and Montenegro were to have what was left of the loot parceled out among ‘em.

It was a Jewish burglar’s deal from send-off, and even Woodrow Wilson didn’t know about it when the Warburg’s and the rest of the Jewish crew finagling us into the mess of it, forced him to declare war over the Lusitania sinking.

The man actually thought that the German Kaiser threatened the world’s Democracy. He sat in the White House and wrote scholarly papers while Baruch ran the shebang from the Sephardic standpoint. When he came to go to Europe for the Peace Conference, after you little male children of the American Legion had left fifty thousand of your buddies lying stark in No Man’s Land for the Messrs. Rothschilds’ railroad, he found out right enough what the war had been about.

“There is a power in Europe with which I cannot cope!” he reported on his return back here to the United States.

He didn’t, however, give it a racial designation!

You fellows were called up from farm and mine, and out of office and factory. The Sephardim, needing you to fight their battles and make certain that the Messrs. Rothschilds’ railroad was smashed, painted the Heinies as being next to human savages — precisely as the same poisonous propaganda is stating today, because Hitler cleaned up Germany and kicked all such Jewish burglars out — and you consented to be drafted and sent to camp as rookies.

You thought the United States was in horrid danger, or your “Democracy” was, and Georgie Cohan wrote Over There! and the regiments began to march down Fifth Avenue in New York, and pretty soon Blackjack Pershing announced that the first contingent of Yanks had landed in France.

How the Sephardic Jews of London must have smiled in smug satisfaction when they had put that one over on you! Reports came out from under cover after the war, in which they practically bragged that it cost Sephardic Great Britain something like 37 cents a head to convert you Americans into doing their battling against the German Ashkenazim for them!

You don’t need to get overly mad yet; there’s more coming. I haven’t finished yet telling you just what went on behind your backs while Mr. Barney Baruch was the real War Boss of the United States.

Had there only been a single purpose behind the World War, namely, the defeat of Rothschild Germany, the division of Europe and a part of Asia, and to secure for the Sephardic financiers the absolute control of commerce and finance, the war could not — and would not! — have lasted six months! But after it got nicely going, the Jews in both camps met up with a surprise.

They discovered the ease with which they could infiltrate their own people into official positions previously held inviolate to Gentiles!

Furthermore, on both sides they discovered the stupendous war profits that they could reap, while the Gentiles bought the bonds, did the fighting, and paid the bills.

They had stumbled onto the mightiest racket in all creation, and something like four millions of them were not slow to get over here into the United States during the four war years and take advantage of it from the American angle.

Jews on both sides, I say, discovered the titanic opportunity presented to them to make money, which in turn meant world power and prestige after the mighty spectacle was ended.

The Jews promoted that war as a business — just as today through all this Relief blither, they’re promoting the Depression as a business! No matter how many millions have to sacrifice and suffer! What of it? They’re only Gentiles!

Now get this, you boys who recall something of what France was like in wet weather, or what the front trenches were like the night of a barrage —

The question of the duration of the World War hinged upon the ability of Germany to obtain sufficient iron ore from which munitions could be manufactured. In May, 1915, in a confidential report, the six great industrial and agricultural associations of Germany advised Chancellor von Bethmann-Hollweg that “if the production of the Lorraine ore was disturbed, the war would be practically lost.”

Engerand, a member of the French Honse of Deputies, says that the German metallurgists had frequently declared that if the German ore mines had been attacked by the French army, “the war would have been finished in six months, with the defeat of Germany.”

In a heated debate in the French House of Deputies, after an investigation conducted by that law-making, body, it came out that the control of the war was in the hands of a few international Jewish families!

These families controlled most of the raw materials used in the manufacture of munitions. Furthermore, they controlled most of the factories making munitions. It appears further that they controlled both the civil governments and the military organizations of both Germany and France.

The French Deputy’s report said bluntly —

“Some of the most notable of these families are the deVendel family, the Thyssen family, the Krupp family, and above them all, the famous international family of the Rothschilds, who are Jews by religion and Barons of Germany, France, and Austria, by business! These ubiquitous families are so interspersed in the various countries that in some of them they are native-born citizens, in other countries they are naturalized citizens. Some of these citizens were found to be members of the governments of opposite warring countries!”

Isn’t it an ironical circumstance, little male children of the American Legion, that I’m telling you about these families and naming them to some of you for the first time, and yet for twenty months you worked for them in your ‘khaki’ uniforms and knew next to nothing about it! You thought you were working for Uncle Sam! The Jews put it over on you!

To speak bluntly, my lads, THEY PLAYED YOU FOR A CROWD OF SUCKERS!

Furthermore, I interrupt myself to tell you that they’re still playing you for a mob of suckers.

I know more than you do about ‘em, and before I get through I’ll convince you of it — provided you’re Gentile!

Chapter VII

Can you still take it, or are you about ready at this point to throw my booklet aside and dismiss me with the execration that I must be a Nazi agent?

Anyhow, I haven’t come yet to the most insufferable part, by a long shot. You’d better stick with me. Maybe you’ll need a few facts to bring up in your next Legion meeting when somebody challenges the probability of the whole of it.

The principal iron mines, smelters, and coal mines of Germany and France, I tell you, were — and still are — located immediately on both sides of the pre-war political boundary line separating the two countries in the Lorraine section.

On the French side there is a very extensive ore section known as the Basin of Briey. In the same region there are extensive coal fields known as the Basin of Bruay.

These iron fields, iron mines, smelters, and coal mines were, before and during the world war, the private property of a few international families or a few international corporations. The deVendel family owned in one property some 25,000 acres of iron land, one-half of which was in German territory and the other half in French territory!

In another property, in the French Basin, the deVendel family, with the Creusot interests — the Krupps of France — owned eight blast furnaces and iron ore mines producing a million tons yearly. On the German side the deVendel family owned mining concessions at Meyeurre and Hayange producing three million tons of ore a year — with blast furnaces and smelters near those mines. In all, the deVendel family controlled about 200,000 acres of iron land in that section.

The Germans, on the other hand, owned eighteen mining concessions in the Briey and Longwy Basin and a few more in Normandy. The Thyssens controlled the mines of Bailly, Jouville and Souligny. The mines of Montlers were controlled by an international group — their stocks being divided: French, 100; German, 70; and Belgian 10.

The German “Phoenix” group — Hasper and Koesch — controlled the French mines at Jarny and Saucy. I could go on for a couple more pages, giving you the data on these ownerships. But you get the idea. And I think you grasp that I know what I’m talking about.

One day, before war was declared, the German army proceeded to seize the French Basin of Briey.

The French Government immediately ordered the French troops to withdraw eight miles from that section! 46

Thus the Germans occupied that important iron territory without the slightest resistance.

Was the war that you fellows were commanded to go and fight in the name of Democracy, a “set-up,” or was it not?

How many of you are aware that the “front” through the Basin of Briey was practically “quiet” throughout the whole war? It was said that not a single man had ever been killed there, until the American army began its drive there against the Germans!

You see, no one seemed to have told Blackjack Pershing that he and his Yanks had been hoaxed into a “set-up” war. He, and they, started to slam-bang in as though it were a regular war, really to save democracy.

The moment the Yanks started in to make a mess of Briey, the whole war collapsed. It would have collapsed six months after it began — and America never have been pulled into it at all — if the Jews hadn’t come to an agreement among themselves to keep it going because of the kale they were piling up, and because there were plenty of Gentiles to fight it!

In the Basin of Briey, about 25 miles behind the front, was the most important iron field from which the Germans dug the greater part of the ore used for their munitions. The German smelters were there, working day and night, preparing iron for ammunition destined to kill French soldiers and later, Americans!

How could Germans mine their fourteen million tons of iron ore 25 miles behind the front, and how could the Krupps manufacture munitions from that ore, if the French or English had bombarded those works and disturbed the peaceful operation of the smelters? Likewise, how could the French mine their 28,000 tons of coal per day, if the “Germans” had recklessly and discourteously bombarded those mines only ten to twelve miles behind the French lines?

The principal business of the international Jewish owners of those mines was to make money during the war! — Berlin-Bagdad Railroad or no Berlin-Bagdad Railroad.

If the Germans had been dislodged from the iron ore fields of Briey — according to the German metallurgists — “the war would have been finished with the defeat of Germany, within six months,” that is, by January 1, 1915. But if the war had come to a conclusion so swiftly, those international Yiddisher interests could not have made their millions, the Krupps could not have manufactured so much ammunition, and there would have been left several million Gentiles alive to oppose the aggressions of predatory Jews. During the war, however, business was business.

The German, English, French, and Belgian international Jewish families were bent on making money, reaping the rich harvest of Gentile dollars-and blood — that eleven years later was to produce the most gigantic international bankruptcy that the world has ever seen. What did they care about life, liberty, and happiness of Gentiles? Sure there were a few Jewish lads here and there in the war. But whenever did the big-shot Jews care much whether their own lower-bracket flesh-and-blood took a rap or two, if the more sizable interests of world Jewry were served?

The enormity of the situation was pointed out by Gustav Tery, editor of L’Ouevre, of Paris, on May 22, 1917. That was about the time we were coming into the “set-up,” remember? He declared that in the minutes of the general meeting, of the blast furnace and steel-mill corporation of Caen, held on March 14, 1916, “it is specified that the Thyssen (German branch of the family) interests, are carefully preserved in the new organization. It is understood that a part of the profits realized by this company in the making of war munitions (for France!) will be put aside for the Thyssen (German!) group, and that, after the war, automatically and legally, the Messrs. Thyssen will receive this large sum!

That’s the kind of a war that made you Legionnaires, my lads of the American Legion!

Need I do any arguing that it might have been the humane thing, as well as to the interests of the French people, to have had the Germans driven out of the Basin of Briey and thus established peace within six months of the war’s beginning? Had it been done, there never would have been any need for America to enter into the war at all. But I said that before! Indeed, General Sarrail of France reasoned somewhat after this fashion, he being a plain dumb Gentile general, and not initiated into the mysteries of the whole Jewish war at all. In 1914 he projected an offensive that, had it been successful, would have driven the Germans out of the Briey.

He was told by the French general staff that it was “too difficult” to maneuver in that district, although the Germans had found no trouble in advancing 14 kilometers in a mere two days!

To assure the tranquillity of the iron mines, so that the war could go on slaughtering Gentiles and eventually costing 50,000 American lives, the patriotic and uninitiated General Sarrail was removed from the command of that front and replaced by the more complaisant General Gerard.

What discourtesy it would have been, no matter how men were dying by the tens of thousands every day elsewhere, to disturb or dislodge the Germans from their peaceful mining of French iron ore!

It is only for the poor devils who have to go through the barrages and breathe the poison gas, that war is not a gentlemen’s agreement! Think it over!

In 1933, a buck private of the German army whose first name was Adolf came to the chancellorship of the German Fatherland and shoveled the whole mob of burglars, shysters, criminals, and blackguards out. I don’t believe in his type of government for the United States, but I’m not letting myself be bamboozled by all the poison-pen screeching that the Jews are doing in consequence — to the end and aim that we should go over a second time and help to dislodge him, that the deVendels, the Thyssens, the Krupps and the Rothschilds should be restored to power and be permitted to repeat.

That’s precisely what the big Sephardic Jew, Rossocampo-Rosenvelt, now sitting in the White House as of New Year’s Eve, 1938-39, is striving his best to have happen with all the official powers at his command!

And around him, thicker than flies about a honey-pot, sit the kith and kin of the same Ashkenazic Mob that only twenty-five years ago were paying ten grand to a Serbian kike to shoot an Archduke and precipitate the whole of it. Fine business, say I! And if I stick my head out and say I know a few things that the rest of America hasn’t yet learned, I’m a Nazi Spy, an agent of Hitler, a Jew-Baiter. I’m “anti-American” because I don’t want to see the growing boys of today shipped overseas to fight any more Ashkenazic-Sephardic fights in a wholesale bamboozlement!

Chapter VIII

The Jews made an ocean of spondulics out of that War. One report has it that out of 100 war profiteers listed in New York State, 75 of them were Jews. Maybe that’s because there are more Jews in York State in proportion to the population than in any other commonwealth. But no matter how much money they made, they sowed the seeds of a whirlwind.

The Central Powers — thanks to us American lads — were reasonably well-thrashed. At least they gave up. But Old Jake Schiff put up a million bucks to send Trotsky (Bronstein) to Russia to join Lenin and produce Bolshevism. The Treaty of London crystallized in practice into the Treaty of Versailles. Germany was stricken with a debt she had to repudiate. Austria and Hungary were first given over to Lenin’s thugs — and the Jew Bela Cohen went in and hamstrung five thousand Gentiles a week. The Red Jews got into Italy in the wake of war’s disintegration and the whole continent of Europe was headed for chaos — Yiddisher chaos!

Suddenly in Italy appeared Mussolini, and he put a halt to Communism. He introduced one-man Fascism because Yiddisher “democracy” doesn’t serve in such a turmoil. Out of Mussolini’s success grew Hitler’s.

Hitler knew the crowd that had wrecked the Fatherland, and he started a one-man war in Germany to best it — and drive it forth.

We know that he did drive it forth. He even went so far as to clap the sacrosanct person of one omnipotent Rothschild in a common hoosegow.

Over here into the United States swarmed the mob of mischief-making scoundrels, to use the Democratic Party, the American press and radio, the American movie screen, to work up a wild hysteria to have Hitler kicked to limbo.

And again we’re falling for paid propaganda and poison-pen bilge, to make us go to war to pull the Rothschild chestnuts out of the fire a second time.

We must do this, it seems, in the name of racial tolerance and religious freedom.

According to the Jewish Statistical Bureau there were only 4,228,029 Jews designated as residents of the United States in 1927, ten years after we entered the war. But in 1937, ten years later, the number had jumped to 12,046,648 — an increase of 8,818,639.

That’s an increase of 17,000 Jews a week in this country, every week for ten years!

Have they got any right here? Have they come in defiance of immigration quotas or have they not? Have our immigration quotas broken down? Or has our government been turned so far Yiddish that no restraints can be put upon this influx even if illegal?

Instead of you little male children of the American Legion getting together every other Friday under some Jewish war “veteran” and griping about the “un-American” growth of Nazism and “racial intolerance,” you’d better do a little scouring into what’s going on right under your noses, to make this the second kind of a Germany that Hitler had to dry-clean and fumigate after he landed in office!

Last Armistice Day I heard and saw a news-reel of American Legion Commander Chadwick on a platform before a mike at Arlington Cemetery, opening the mouth that’s in his face, and emitting a great belch of applesauce about this country’s having no room for any ism but Americanism!

What did he mean, Americanism?

Does Americanism consist of standing aside, with a sappy look on the face, and keeping the hands thrust in the pockets while a gang of international mobsters continue to make hash of Christian-Gentile institutions?

What does Americanism mean?

And what was Chadwick doing, but toadying to the same clique of international Yiddishers who once finagled not to have the Briey Basin bombed, so that their Gentile war could go according to Hoyle on all fronts but in the Jewish-industrial area?

The American Legion prides itself on advocating and fighting for Americanism. Very good, then; why doesn’t it get up on its hind legs and do a little fighting against the conniving Yiddisher who’s brought a whirlwind of cataclysm on the heads of universal Christendom?

I say that I’m challenging the American Legion! I’m challenging Commander Chadwick, making his stooge-speech for Americanism that he doesn’t define — and couldn’t define if he tried! He took a nasty poke at thousands of fine men in my own organization — men who aren’t bamboozled by Yiddisher propaganda and don’t go ‘round playing the inside game of a people that gave Christian institutions a body-blow twenty years ago and are simply being called by Kismet to pay for it.

I want to know what he means by Americanism!

The men he heads were Duped by Judah twenty-odd years bygone.

Fifty thousand dead boys — good Americans! — are sleeping in graves overseas because the Rothschilds wanted to construct a railroad from Berlin down to Bagdad and the owners of the Bank of England stopped ‘em by wrecking the country they came from.

Is it Americanism to let the same mob come swarming over here and play eternal high jinks with this nation too?

If so, and Chadwick speaks for it officially, let the American Legion change its name to the Jewish War Veterans, en masse, and have done with bamboozlement.

Chapter IX

Anyhow, I’ve given you fellows the cold hard, hitherto suppressed facts of precisely what started the War and dragged you into it, and gave you the basis for a Legion at all.

That War is now twenty-five years — a quarter-century — in retrospect. We’ve lived long enough, and had time enough, to view it in the abstract, to cool down from the hysterias of military tempo.

We went overseas — bought like the Gentile cattle that we were for 37 cents per head! — and stopped the German pig-iron that was smelted in France, that the world might be made safe for Yiddish Democracy.

Was it made safe for Democracy — anybody’s Democracy?

How could it be made safe for something that never existed, excepting in an elementary form in ancient Greece? Moreover, what business did we have fooling in the “protection of Democracy,” anyway, seeing that our United States isn’t a Democracy but a Republic?

If we had real Democracy in this country, it would mean the direct hour-to-hour rule of the majority. But instead of hour-to-hour rule of the majority we got hour-to-hour rule of a ten-percent mob of Jews — 275 of them in the highest key positions in our Federal government! — running the affairs of 120 million Gentiles!

There are, by admitted Yiddisher census, 12,046,649 Jews within our United States. That’s nearly ten percent of our entire population. And they supervise our press, they dictate our government, they shovel their smut out via radio and movie, then they get up on their hind legs and screech “racial intolerance” if a mere Gentile gets his back up and suggests that a country 90 percent Gentile ought to have federal, cultural, and political institutions that are free from the blight of the ethics of the Jewish 10 percent.

They don’t even believe in the American brand of Constitutionalism. They want their High Priest Kommissar Kommunism to be installed over here. Who’s opposed every legislative move to benefit the veterans? Jews! And Chadwick apparently works for ‘em!

When they failed to get Communism by Red Sit-Down striking, or crack-pot economics out of Washington, they try the stunt of screeching about America’s need for a swollen army and navy, and a War Resources Bill that creates a Five-Minister War Government, with the President as its head and four War Ministers (to be Big Jews of course!) about him, accountable to nobody but themselves.

I put it to you lads of the American Legion — have we all gone nuts?

Seven years ago knowing this sort of thing was coming, I turned my back on private enterprise good for twenty-five grand a year to my bank account — to launch the Silvershirts on a personal remuneration of one dollar a year.

I meant to create an organization throughout this nation that should actually do what the American Legion might do, or should be doing, if it didn’t raise the race question: See that the majority ruled in this country, not a 10 percent minority, and that patriotism comprised something other than marching through all the best downtown streets on Armistice Day and pasting membership posters on all the best billboards as the outdoor advertising companies donated space.

I wasn’t afraid of the race question. If a crowd of burglars moved into the nation, and everything they touched immediately developed — subversion, bankruptcy, and confusion, I didn’t propose to overlook the fact that they were burglars just because they were Jewish in race and religion.

If they were burglarizing the nation in the name of the Jewish race and religion, then I would treat with them in the name of the Jewish race and religion when it came to reprisals or punishments.

“We Jews have spoiled the blood of all the races,” says Dr. Munzer, a Jew, in his book The Way of Zion. “We have tarnished and broken their power. We have made everything foul, rotten, decomposed, and decayed.”

“You certainly have,” I was willing to agree, “but I’ll be hanged before I’ll let you make everything in the United States foul, rotten, decomposed, and decayed, if I have anything to say about it — and I flatter myself I can have quite a lot to say.”

So I’ve gotten out, over a seven-year period, and organized a crowd of virile Americans in twenty-two States that are now giving the Jewish Locust-Swarm and what from Europe the unmitigated jitters. My men don’t march up and down the best streets on Armistice Day, or paste posters on donated billboards, or pass resolutions against Communism in conventions and then offer their rostrums to the biggest Communists in the nation. My crowd is organized so that nobody but the leaders of their own Posts know who they are. But let trouble start anywhere in the nation — from a “purge” of the State Democratic parties of constitutional Americans, to another marine strike in Seattle or an attempted sabotage of industry by sit-down strikes in Michigan, Ohio, or Pennsylvania, and always up near the head of the vigilante leaders you find a Silvershirt or a knot of Silvershirts. My publishing house put out two million pieces of literature last year, exposing the whole pernicious, nation-wide, Yiddisher fanagglement. And I’m evidently so terribly right in my position, and the Silvershirts are scouring to such extent, that a public Silvershirt meeting announced for Chicago is equal to a public riot; thugs and gunmen paid by Jews wade into such meetings and begin sending men and women to hospitals. Peaceable and lawful meetings! The audiences respectable and information-hungry ladies and gentlemen! The subject-matter harangued from the platform, the necessity for keeping our Republic free of the foulness, rottenness, and decomposition that the Jew Munzer talks about! And without a word of warning the rioters come smashing in, bludgeoning all and sundry! And in the face of such thuggery and depredation, the German Bunders seem to be the only other organization in the nation not afraid to gang up and put in an oar to help halt it.

And what is the American Legion doing, while this sort of thing is in progress?

From where I sit, it’s organized to screech against both Silvershirts and German Bunders from public platforms, and call anybody who does anything patriotic besides parade on Armistice Day, un-American!

Maybe I’m wrong, but that’s how I see it!

The veterans of the Messrs. Rothschild’s Franco-German War or Ashkenazic-Sephardic War get together in Posts every other Tuesday, find their programs and resolutions all nicely laid out for ‘em, do precisely what their officers or rules committees tell ‘em, agree to hold a dance the first of the month and then go home. Once a year the national gang holds a convention somewhere that costs a lot of money to attend. The delegates listen to a lot of spellbinders who defend the Jews and damn the Silvershirts and German Bunders. In the evenings they get plastered and raise ‘ell. A week later the merchants take down the bunting and count the profits. The American Legion has held another convention. And it hasn’t meant a thing!

Witness the spectacle of the American Legion Convention in Chicago passing resolutions savagely denouncing Communism, a couple of years back, and then turning over its platform to the Jew, LaGuardia, from New York — who hates Communists about as bad as Franklin D. Roosevelt hates instructed New-Deal delegates. Any Silvershirt could have told the American Legionnaires that LaGuardia was practically elected by the Communist vote!

And yet it’s not to be wondered at.

You little male children of the American Legion were hoaxed, hoodwinked, and buffaloed into going over-seas and doing your part to stop the building of the Berlin-Bagdad Railroad. You’re in the same pitiable plight now in being herded into the Legion so that the Messrs. Rothschild’s American agents can keep you on the job of protecting and championing God’s Chosen People, no matter what they do to your government or bank account.

A national mob of ex-soldiers, unorganized, is a dangerous element after a war in any nation — especially if someone starts telling ‘em the truth about which bunch of blackguards started the war and for what. But organize ‘em, tell ‘em in fancy-sounding phrases that they’re “a great force for patriotism,” and they don’t get out of hand and start settling accounts.

In other words, it keeps up the military discipline till it can be used again.

The poor duped veterans are ready to agree that they’re “a great force for patriotism,” and a little clever manipulation then fixes everything so they never come to demonstrate it.

When I call you Dupes of Judah, little male children of the American Legion, you needn’t get sore. Even in being “a great force for patriotism” — without ever doing anything about it but march and pass resolutions — you’re Dupes of Judah. Even in the Legion fulminations that will surely raise against me for writing and circulating, this book, you’re Dupes of Judah.

The Jews had you right where they wanted you in 1917, and used you to stop the Ashkenazic pig-iron and sniff the gas, that you might halt an unwanted railroad from being built. The Jews have you right where they want you in 1939, and are using you to stop an anti-Semitic Silvershirt organization from being built, merely because the question of race is involved. Jews and their acts are inviolate against criticism or attack, it seems, and anyone or anything that brings their race in question is “un-American”!

A few odd-thousand jewish boys went to the war because they were drafted and couldn’t help it, or they grabbed off desk-jobs in Washington that gave ‘em excuse to put on uniforms. Now when the leaders of their race are openly bragging about what Jews as a race are succeeding in doing to constitutional government and Christian institutions, no Gentile ex-soldier is supposed to say or do anything about it. He had Jew buddies in the war with him! That puts the whole American Legion out of the running — to do anything against the predatory and gloating Israelite — at a stroke. Clever business, what?

When the Armistice was signed, I was two thousand versts out on the wastes of wintry Siberia with the thermometer at forty below, my only protection from the killing blasts an army uniform and a rough corset of dispatches around my waist. I not only saw the War. I saw Communism come into the country with my own eyesight. When I got home, I made up my mind that it wasn’t going to blight my United States.

So! For personally determining that Communism wasn’t going to blight the United States, and doing something more about it than march up and down on the 11th of November, or paste posters of Grecian ladies on billboards, I’ve been probed twice by Congress. I’ve been attacked by the Red La Follette Committee in the Senate — and given it a shellacking! — and my men did more than any other single agency in seeing that Rossocampo’s “purge” went sour across a group of strategic States. Martin Dies — with Jews around him thicker than mosquitoes in New Jersey at sundown — gave it out the other day that “Silvershirts are becoming so formidable in this nation, that in one Pennsylvania district they practically pre-dominate!”

I’m not meaning to brag in recounting these items. I’m calling your attention to the fact that if the American Legion were something other than a Jew-muzzled organization subtly steered so as to defend and champion the nation’s despoilers, there wouldn’t be any need for Silvershirts and they never would have appeared.

Name one thing that the American Legion has been allowed to do since its formation, to dynamite this sabotage of American government and morals — aside from passing resolutions against Communism and fulminating against Silvershirts and Bunders as “un-American.”

A tree is known by its fruits. Christ said that, a long time ago. But Christ doesn’t seem to be overly popular with American Legion Posts since the Jews took over — excepting as a mouth-filling cuss word. How many times have you heard Christ’s name invoked in Legion Post meetings? The name of “God,” yes! God, according to all the best Bibles, is very, very Jewish. But Christ was such a Jew-Baiter that they dragged Him off and killed Him. If you think that such deletions come about by accident, you’re crazy.

There are plenty of bowels in the American Legion — just as there were plenty of bowels in the AEF that sailed to France. But the Jewish War Veterans, the koonlobers, the Jew-kept press, and the smart Yiddisher boys everywhere pushing in as Post commanders and officers, don’t give ‘em much chance to function unless it’s to push into some sort of liquid fire and rake out chestnuts with a neat little six-pointed star branded upon each.

And with many thousands of Jews let into the country every week since 1914, and a Sanhedrin in the White House piling up a 40 billion dollar national debt, Chadwick gets up at Arlington and prates over a Yiddisher radio network that there’s no room in this country for anything but “Americanism.”

In God’s name, what’s the man talking about?

Chapter X

Up in Washington the week that I’m writing these lines, a new Congress is meeting. Some say it’s the last Congress that is ever going to meet, but the vigorously pro-Jewish American Legion probably wouldn’t know anything about that! Anyhow, in that Congress the relatives, progeny, or stooges of the same kosher mob that ordered us to risk our lives to stop the building of the Berlin-Bagdad Railroad — and wouldn’t let the Briey Basin be bombed until we’d been pulled into the brawl — are introducing two Bills. One is H.R. 9604. The other is S. 1248.

Both of these Bills represent legislation that would do on a wholesale scale in the next Yiddish war what was attempted only on a piker scale in 1917.

Instead of conscripting a few buck privates to go over and wreck Germany so that the Rothschilds couldn’t complete their railroad, the Yiddishers now propose to fight the war all over again by conscripting the whole nation!

Of course they’ve camouflaged these Bills under a lot of bologna-phrases, such as “taking the profits out of war,” just as they camouflaged the 1917 conscription under the bologna-phrase “making the world safe for Democracy.”

Give the Gentiles a good bologna-phrase, and they seem to be willing to do whatever the Yiddishers want, even to die as happy as possible.

Down deep under all the applesauce and skulduggery, however, here’s the stark low-down on what’s happening —

Communism by open revolution in this nation is proving an expensive bust to the big banking Jews who’ve been seeing it got the kale. The pendulum of popularity has commenced to swing away from Rossocampo-Rosenvelt and gives every indication of going out like a light. Something must be hatched up between eleven o’clock and lunch to keep the Jews in control who’ve weaseled into Federal government since the start of this Depression.

The expedient is a coast-to-coast screech about the terrible State of the national defense, and how utterly unprepared the United States is for another war, in the event that Rossocampo and his Yiddishers can get one provoked with either Germany or Japan.

It’s the Old Army Game all over again, little male children of the American Legion: Never give the suckers an even break!

So the Jew-kept press and radio are going to town on what terrible people the Nazis and Japanese are, because Judah has had her clutch smashed on control of both of those countries. And with a “national emergency” in sight — just like the “inevitable” war that finally came to pass in 1914 — the Congress must lay the cornerstones for the sort of War Government the Jews want here, by legislation.

They’ve prepared two Bills for the attention of the present Congress. One is Senate Bill 1248. The other is House Bill 9604. Both of these appear on the surface to be measures to more effectively organize the country in time of war by mobilizing all the nation’s resources under a general Conscription Act. In the event of another war, everybody and everything are going to be conscripted — men and women, old and young alike. But that’s not the worst of it. They’re going to set up a lot of those alphabetical bureaus, and at the head of each one is going to be a Chairman. These Chairmen are going to be accountable not to Congress or the people but to the President. He, with the heads of four of these bureaus, is going to run the war. And there is nothing in the Act which makes him accountable to ANYBODY!

During the run of a war “or a national emergency” this five-man board is to be the government! It is going to be known as the War Ministry Government. The Constitution makes no provision for any such hocus-pocus, Congress has no authority to put such legislation on the statute books. All the same, they’re going ahead and will try to put it over. And the measure that thus abolishes Constitutionalism during such a war is commonly known as the War Resources Act.

Now this War Resources Bill — or Bills — means vicious mischief!

It is the NRA introduced all over again, only lifted above all chance of unconstitutionality because it appears concerned with the national defense, It provides not only for the creation of a super War Cabinet to run the country, but for the country’s actual supervision by five great economic agencies, each having the word “War” so concerned in its title, that it cannot be attacked without the critic’s appearing to agitate seditiously against the nation’s military or laying himself open to a charge of being in the pay of America’s enemies.

The first of these new bureaucracies is to be called the War Labor Administration.

The avowed purpose of WLA is to “insure” maintenance and distribution of war labor, skilled or un-skilled, as industry may require. Believe it or not, no private citizen nor even his representative in the House or Senate, has the slightest “say” as to what shall be done with his person or his labor, the moment the nation has once declared war. Congress relinquishes. Constitutional rights go by the board. The super War Cabinet Kommissars — the Baruchs of the nation — take charge of everyone and everything, and the slightest disobedience to fiat or arbitrary ruling means that the recalcitrant or hostile citizen is locked in prison at once.

To insure proper supplies of war materials, civilian food requirements for all conscripted Gentile citizens, the War Trade Administration is to be the second great bureaucracy, conducting industrial mobilization and superintending transportation.

The moment that the powerful Jews at the head of our government have forced a war with some foreign power — probably Japan — all private rights in businesses throughout the nation abruptly cease to exist. The nation automatically becomes one vast corporate State, under sterner regulation than anything devised by Mussolini or Hitler. Under excuse that such methods are necessary to prosecute the war, private ownership and management are to be abolished as archaic; managers are to be shipped and trafficked around at the pleasure of the War Ministers — and presumably the same Jews now carrying on such radicalisms as NLRB and other Soviet agencies, are to take full command of all Gentile firms and corporations.

During the pursuance of such a war as present propaganda is expected to bring about, all commercial business expansion will come to a halt. No corporation can issue securities that amount to more than $100,000 without the consent of the third great bureau to be set up under the War Resources Bill, to be called the War Finance Control Committee.

Of course, whoever controlled WFCC would not only control the finances of the nation, but likewise control the successful outcome of the war.

Such a war, under such a control, could not be fought as we fought the World War; for there is no longer any great cache of personal wealth in the nation to be brought out of hiding by the sale of war bonds. Money for such a war would have to be raised by the same “sales” of bonds that have been keeping the New Deal alive — taking the last capital remaining in the hands of banks, and giving them beautifully lithographed paper in return, or issuing fiat currency which in the history of every government has meant ruinous inflation.

During the last war it was not generally known that Paul M. Warburg was the great Jew alleged to be surveillance officer in the White House for Jewry, that Felix Warburg was the Jewish big shot on the War Finance Board, while at the same time, Max Warburg, the blood brother of these two, was reputed to be head executive of the German espionage system! In the event of another war, it is asking too much for wise Gentiles to believe that under the War Resources Bill there would be no repetitions of such Yiddish family high jinks.

The fourth provision for successful Yiddish Sovietism in the name of national defense under the War Resources Bill, would be the Advisory Defense Council. This would be a super-cabinet made up of the heads of the foregoing three agencies, responsible only to our Sephardic-Jewish President, and acting independently of his present official cabinet.

The Secretary of War as provided by custom and constitutional procedure, the military committees of the Congress, all the usual bodies which have enabled us to fight successfully every war in which our nation has engaged, would be automatically emasculated or tossed into discard by this new scheme which the Jews would now impose on our nation.

Finally a Price Control Commission would be established — also responsible only to the President — with blanket instructions to maintain the price levels of commodities as they have existed for twenty years preceding the war.

Thus all laws of supply and demand would go by the Board and we should have price by fiat.

This Price Control Commission is to fix the price of any commodity anywhere, and be responsible to no one but the President.

Now get the joker in the whole of it —

Under this War Resources Act, and during the prosecution of the war, the President could “requisition, take possession, regulate, limit, license, or prohibit, the purchase or sale, the use, importation or exportation, transportation, manufacture or distribution of any product, foodstuff, material, commodity, real estate or right.”

Get that last! … any real estate or right!

The wording of this particular clause makes it congressionally legal to close down all newspapers that might in any way disapprove of what the WRA happened to be doing to — or with — the country or its defense, prohibit the “right” of free speech or peaceable public assembly, trial by jury for offenses allegedly committed against the Act, and place the entire nation in the arbitrary hands of five men — Rossocampo-Rosenvelt at the head of them!

Nothing is said in the Bill, by the way, about restoring such real estate or rights. The government has the power to take them away, and there this Bill leaves the matter dangling!

Another Bill that is supposed to go along with the War Resources Bill is one for so-called Industrial Management. It is arbitrary and curt. It simply requires every person in industry to register with the government so he can be brought into the government if and when needed.

A Bureau of Women and Minors, will be created among the hundreds of new bureaus. It will assume jurisdiction over the 10 million women and children now estimated to be working in industry, commerce and the professions. Those whom the head war kommissars specified, would be recruited into the munitions and essential industries, to take the place of men, from the start.

Everything in the War Resources Bill, in short, is precisely of the structure and pattern that for the past twenty years have been the design of the totalitarian-Communist-Soviet State in Bolshevia!

Now WE must have it in the name of Defense!

Is it any wonder that with all this war-time Sovietism proposed, and rendered sacrosanct by its tie-up with the nation’s military, the Silver Legion thunders a warning across this country that any measure so inimical to constitutional government — even constitutional government in time of war — must not be passed “in a handful of hours,” and if humanly possible, not passed at all!

The whole scheme, according to well-informed persons at the nation’s Capital, is accredited as having been hatched in the fertile brain of Bernard M. Baruch.

It is being whipped into shape by Administration Jews.

In the event that it is actualized during the balance of Franklin Roosevelt’s term, it will be executed by Jews — and Jews of the type who believe that naught but Sovietism is the form of government under which Jews in America can feel themselves safe.

The pernicious side of this atrocious and far-reaching legislation is indicated by the secrecy and silence with which it is being treated in the press. No legislators are openly discussing it. No articles are appearing upon it in our national periodicals. Everything is being shaped up for the absolute dictatorship of Rossocampo-Rosenvelt — and his compatriots — in the name of the sacred cow of Public Protection.

He who declaims against the NVRA — so one might deduce — declaims against the continuity of America as a nation, prepared to defend herself against her world enemies.

What is being finagled, if such legislation is enacted into law, is, that everybody in the government, below the President and including both Houses of the Congress, is being legislated from official status the moment a conflict shall have been provoked with any nation.

Every Congressman and Senator, every federal official and department head with the exception of the President, is being legislated out of his job, back into the status of a private — and conscripted-citizen, till peace has been declared. The War Cabinet manages everything. And even so, there is no more assurance that the President-Dictator and the War Cabinet would relinquish after peace had been declared, than we now have assurance that the various Jewish bureaus set up in Washington will ever relinquish until made to do so by civilian force!

What is being attempted, under H. R. 9604, if it actually is rushed through Congress in a matter of hours, is a piece of legislation that promptly and effectively abolishes constitutional government which has maintained in this country for 150 years.

Probable war is merely the excuse!

Is anyone so gullible as to expect that during the progress of such war, such a Soviet kommissariat wouldn’t bring about conditions under which resumption of a constitutional republic could only be effected by the expedients of General Franco’s forces in Spain?

I declare that all of it is a supreme piece of Yiddish cunning to effect an NRA that no Supreme Court can invalidate.

It is the supreme effort of the secret world Jewish government, to bring the Gentiles of the United States under its control so that they never escape without enduring Russia’s agonies.

And Democrats and Republicans alike, in the current Congress, are going to be asked to get together, “For the unbiased good of the nation,” and make the final suicide of constitutional government effective.

The press, signing its own death warrant by keeping quiet on the whole of it, is treating the matter as though H.R. 9604 were a bit of legislation to pay off old soldiers in Oshkosh and Keokuk.

So far, since H.R. 9604 first gained notice at the Capital in any status whatsoever, nobody has called attention to the fact that we already possess federal agencies and enactments on the statute books to take care of every emergency which another war might bring.

Our system of a Secretary of War and a Secretary of the Navy, with the appropriate committees on the military in the Congress, has functioned without flaw in every war in which our country has engaged.

Americans do not require to be bossed or shipped around like cattle merely because there is likelihood of the Jews’ embroiling us in conflict with Germany, Japan, or some other country that has successfully halted Communism. There is plenty of patriotism left to fight our battles successfully if our country’s plight be real.

Regimentation of a nation, even in war-time, still is regimentation!

The question before the American people is: Are we going to let the Jews succeed in this last stupendous trickery, or are we going to FIGHT? Think it over, little male children of the American Legion! But don’t take too much time.

Congress met on January 2nd, and WRA is to be enacted into law as quickly as can be finagled!

Now then, I put the challenge openly, bluntly, and angrily: If the American Legion is “a great force for patriotism,” what does it propose to do about seeing that all this Yiddisher hocus-pocus is ended, these War-Ministry Bills consigned to limbo, and the country itself purged of the Gang that’s almost wrecked it?

I’m plenty sore about this thing. I know slathers of fine lads, even right in the American Legion at present, who are plenty sore about it also.

But what are we going to DO about it?

The American Legion is not supposed to “mess in politics” … that’s another laugh! … but it is supposed to do something besides parade and paste things on billboards when the national integrity of the country is at stake!

Sooner or later one of three things has got to happen to the American Legion: Either it yanks the Yiddish halter off its neck and starts herding Yiddishers back on the boats for Europe, or it comes out openly as Judah’s defense army of Rothschild-War veterans, or it disbands and goes home! There’s no need to raise the controversy about the surreptitious story that the American Legion was founded on koonlobe money at Indianapolis in the beginning; when the American branch of the House of Rothschild make donations like that, they never keep minutes of the meetings with the Boys in the Back-room. Like the authenticity of the Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion, the truth or falsity of ‘em has to be demonstrated by whether or not they are put into practice. To date, the American Legion, through its commanders and its Posts, has never lifted a split thumb to put the blame for either Communism or New-Dealism where it belongs. Individually, thousands of you lads have griped day by day that there’s too many “kikes” running things; but saying so as a Legionnaire, or forcing the Legion to demand a show-down on it from Congress, is one of those things that you don’t do.

Why not?

“The Legion isn’t organized for that sort of thing,” is the asinine alibi.

Well, will some human gazebo in his right mind tell me just what the American Legion is organized for, justifying its existence? What does it get you men, to belong to it? Hasn’t the time arrived when you as Legionnaires should stand up and “speak your piece”? Haven’t you as veterans been booted around by those big Washington Yiddishers about long enough?

Remember, after you’d fought the war and earned your bonus, it was Mr. Barney Baruch — big-shot Jew “who had more power in the war than any other individual” — who most actively opposed paying it.

You’ve been treated as scum by the Yiddishers right straight along, and yet you go on working for ‘em and defending ‘em. So what!

I saw just as much service, day for day, in the Rothschild-Berlin-Bagdad Railroad War as any of you. And I’m not ranting all this to make myself a big-shot. But I’ve made it my business to dig down to hardpan and find out what this bankruptcy and sabotage of our country are all about.

If I’ve made it sound in this booklet, that I’ve been patronizing you, forget it! I’ve been trying to put this big subject in language strong enough to make you fighting mad, so that you’ll go forth and do something about it. Go into your next Legion Post meeting and raise ‘ell about it! Raise ‘ell about the Jews! … Well, why not? Aren’t they raising ‘ell with you?

They’re trying to make the United States of America their personal Jewtopia (Jew-Utopia), their new Land of Canaan, overflowing with milk and honey.

Are we going to be saps enough to let ‘em get away with it?

Now go ahead and do one of two things: Make a big fuss over this Jew Crowd and start ‘em moving out! Or obey the orders of the smart little Jew boy who’s got himself a big position in your Post, and let out a roar that what I’ve told you as an honest American — straight from the shoulder — is “Nazi propaganda” and ought to be suppressed!

It’s one thing or the other!

Take your choice!

Via JR Books Online [NOW OFFLINE!]